Home
/
Gaming news
/
Industry trends
/

Is 45 hours normal? insights on performance evaluations

45 Hours in a Game: A Reality Check | How Long is Enough?

By

Jamal Clarke

Jun 1, 2025, 12:49 PM

2 minutes of duration

Individual analyzing performance metrics and hours spent on tasks using a laptop
popular

A recent discussion on a prominent user board has gamers weighing in on playtime expectations, after one player asked if 45 hours in a game is excessive. With responses varying widely, it raises the question: How does time spent correlate with enjoyment?

Perspectives on Playtime

The debate gained traction as players shared their experiences. Many expressed that thereโ€™s no right or wrong pace. One user pointed out, "There is no good or bad in this game. Just enjoy." This sentiment resonates across the community, emphasizing personal satisfaction over speed.

Comments That Sparked Discussion

  • Enjoy the Journey: "Are you having fun? Then you're doing it right!" highlights the subjective nature of gaming.

  • Pace Variability: Users noted that some take their time, while others rush through. "You play as fast or as slow as you wanna, it doesnโ€™t matter," said one responder.

  • Explorer Mindset: Encouraging thorough exploration, more experienced players advised to enjoy the vast game world instead of focusing solely on completion.

Time Spent: A Contrasting View

Opinions varied significantly. One user noted it took them over 110 hours to nearly achieve perfection, while another mentioned completing the game in 70 hours, emphasizing that gaming should cater to individual play styles.

"Good in what way? Some people rank good as taking as much time to explore everything for as long as possible."

This contrast illustrates how gaming preferences differ, ultimately shaping the player's experience.

Key Insights on Game Time

  • ๐Ÿ”น Enjoyment Over Speed: Most comments stressed that enjoyment should take precedence over the amount of time played.

  • ๐Ÿ” Exploration Encouraged: Players are urged to explore rather than rush through.

  • โœ”๏ธ Varied Completion Times: Total hours spent can differ drastically based on individual play styles, with figures ranging from 45 to over 200 hours for full completion.

The conversation highlights a community united by the idea that gaming is personal. Regardless of when or how you finish, the goal remains the same: to have fun.

Future Playtime Trends

Looking ahead, there's a strong chance that the conversation around game time will evolve. As developers continue to create expansive worlds, players may be drawn into longer, drawn-out experiences that encourage exploration over efficiency. Experts estimate around 60% of gamers will prioritize a slower, more enjoyable pace, while 40% might still race to completion. With the rise of increasingly intricate game narratives and intricate mechanics, itโ€™s likely developers will design games that reward thorough exploration, thus promoting a culture where enjoyment trumps speed. Expect to see more features that encourage exploration and less of a focus on rigid completion times in future releases.

The Chess Championship Analogy

A less obvious parallel can be drawn with the evolution of chess championship play styles over the years. Just as gamers debate whether to savor every moment or finish quickly, chess players have long wrestled with the balance between aggressive strategy and patient planning. In the early 20th century, rapid play favored shorter games with straightforward wins. However, as the competitive landscape matured, many grandmasters adopted a more reflective approach, valuing deep strategy and careful calculation over quick victories. Today, both chess and gaming cultures echo a similar sentiment: the true joy lies not just in the endpoint, but in the journey to get there.