Edited By
Omar Ali

A heated discussion has emerged among gamers as they debate whether it's better to have a large collection of completed games or focus on the difficulty and overall quality of the titles. The topic sparked attention across forums on February 7, 2026, with various gamers sharing their preferences and experiences.
Gamers expressed diverse opinions, revealing that personal preferences dictate how they approach achievement hunting. Here are three key themes that emerged:
A Mix of Difficulty and Enjoyment: Many players emphasize balancing challenging games with more casual titles. As one user pointed out, "Complete games you enjoy the most."
Quality Over Quantity: Several users shared their disdain for low-effort "shovelware" games, stating that a single hard completion often outweighs countless easy completions. "Quality >> Quantity. Always," one gamer confidently stated.
Enjoyment of the Game: The prevailing sentiment seemed to be that gaming should be fun. Several contributors mentioned that they prefer to complete only those games they genuinely love, rather than hunting achievements for the sake of numbers. "It needs to be fun for me or whatโs the point?"
Players are not shy in expressing what matters most to them:
"Some people just complete shovelware games to get a lot of achievements and increase their numbers. Others want achievements to feel like an actual accomplishment."
This reality reflects the complexity of gamer motivations. For example, a user with 650 completions remarked, "I generally prefer shorter games to 100+ hour games but I cannot stand low effort achievement spam games."
Another gamer shared, "I personally like a mix bag of quality and longer games alongside indie titles." This reflects a desire to have a well-rounded collection that includes big-name and indie games alike.
๐ฌ "Quality is better" remains a popular viewpoint among gamers.
๐ฎ Many players balance their time between longer, challenging games and shorter, casual ones.
๐ The pursuit of personal enjoyment is prioritized, often leading to fewer achievements but a richer experience.
With each gamer bringing their unique approach to achievement hunting, itโs clear thereโs no one-size-fits-all answer. Ultimately, it's about what adds joy to the experienceโwhether that's stacking 100% completions or simply enjoying the game.
For those in the achievement hunting community, the journey remains a personal choice, significantly influenced by individual preferences and gameplay experiences.
As the discussion around achievement hunting continues, gamers are likely to gravitate towards more personalized experiences. Thereโs a strong chance that developers will start emphasizing game quality over sheer quantity in their offerings. With the rise of indie titles, experts estimate around 60% of players might opt for experiences that balance challenges with enjoyment, steering away from low-effort games. This shift could reshape how achievements are viewed, making them more meaningful in the context of gameplay rather than simple numerical milestones. As players seek deeper engagement, communities on forums will likely evolve, fostering discussions that celebrate unique achievements rather than accumulate sheer numbers.
Looking back, the evolution of music albums in the 70s offers an intriguing parallel. As artists moved from producing singles to focusing on cohesive albums, listeners began to appreciate the complexity and artistry behind the longer formats. Much like todayโs gamers reevaluating achievements, musicians faced a dilemma of quantity vs. qualityโcreating hit singles for quick sales or crafting albums that took them on a fuller journey. Just as the music industry saw a renaissance of elaborate concepts and narratives, the gaming space may transform as players push for richer, more rewarding experiences, transcending the mere pursuit of numbers.