Controversy continues to heat up within gaming forums as new comments surface on a recently launched skin. While many find it cute, an increasing number of players are criticizing its placement in the battle pass.
The skin has sparked further discussions on user boards, with reactions becoming more extreme. Some players express anger over what they see as wasted battle pass slots. One commenter stated, "I wouldnโt mind if they released it in an item shop or even Lego pass. But in the battle pass it takes up place for other characters that fans want, like General Grievous for an example."
Character Slots at Stake
Many agree that more iconic characters should take precedence. A user lamented, "Another to be locked away in the archive, to make way for the true shit post skin of the season."
Critique on Gender Misrepresentation
A user corrected another, asserting, "First of all, General Grievous is a male. I thought that was pretty obvious, but APPARENTLY not."
Divided Aesthetic Opinions
Sentiments are mixed; another user bluntly stated, "Burn it," emphasizing the negativity surrounding the skin.
Many agree that more iconic characters should take precedence. A user lamented, "Another to be locked away in the archive, to make way for the true shit post skin of the season."
A user corrected another, asserting, "First of all, General Grievous is a male. I thought that was pretty obvious, but APPARENTLY not."
Sentiments are mixed; another user bluntly stated, "Burn it," emphasizing the negativity surrounding the skin.
Comments range widely from admiration to blunt criticism, highlighting a rift in community sentiment. While some find charm in the skin, others can't fathom its place in coveted battle pass slots.
โ "In the battle pass it takes up place for other characters that fans want."
๐ "It really isnโt worth it."
๐ "Another to be locked away in the archive"
As discussions on forums become more intense, will this skin's reception change, or is it destined to remain a controversial topic? Only time will tell.