Home
/
Esports
/
Match analysis
/

Final scores from americas year 5 pl day #3 group b vs. c

AMERICAS Year 5 PL Day #3 | Group B vs. C Ends in Discontent

By

Fatima Khan

Apr 21, 2025, 10:49 PM

Edited By

Emily Johnson

Updated

Apr 23, 2025, 07:07 PM

2 minutes of duration

Teams celebrating after the match between Group B and Group C in the Americas Year 5 Premier League
popular

Day 3 of the AMERICAS Year 5 Pro League was marked by frustration as fans expressed strong disapproval of top teams' performances, particularly questioning 100 Thievesโ€™ strategy. Complaints about recurring map zones intensified the debate around competitive fairness.

Consistent Performance from Fusion

Many fans noted that Fusion played consistently throughout the day. One comment stated, "Fusion 2/6 on ring consoles, 4/12 in total, and still looking great even as a hard zone team." This strong showing could label them as dark horses for the split.

100T's Strategy Under Fire

Fans were quick to criticize 100 Thieves for their passive approach, particularly during key moments. One commenter lamented, "Wtf happened to 100T today?" Another noted the unique challenges faced by NA West Coast players who often compete with ping averaging between 110-130, impacting team dynamics.

Discussions on Team Strategies

Debate erupted regarding team roles and strategies. One fan observed that Phony tends to initiate fights, often placing responsibility on teammates like Verhulst, which has led to confusion in gameplay. A user pointed out, "I think they should try to switch Gen back to anchor (he is the best anchor in apex) and let Evan be the fragger."

Players expressed sentiment about needing stronger teamwork and strategic alignment. Commenters noted:

"Putting both Evan on the frontlines with Gen instead of having him fumble around with castle walls would make them much more aggressive and terrifying as a team."

Repeated Map Zones Fuel Controversy

The recurring map zones drew further ire, with one fan stating, "Congrats for the winners, but devs need to do something with exact same zones repeating over and over." The call for developers to mix up the zones reiterated concerns about competitive parity.

Community Sentiment: Divided Opinions

Commentary on player performances revealed stark divisions. While some see hope in individual players like Verbussy, others pointed out significant underperformance:

"I believe Verhulst will start farming soon tho, but he seems to be struggling in the current meta."

Overall, there was a mix of positive and negative sentiments around players' capabilities and strategies, with discussions on how to adjust moving forward as the league progresses.

Highlights

  • Consistent Play from Fusion: They may become dark horses this split.

  • Concerns Over 100T Strategy: Fans question their avoidance of direct confrontation.

  • Map Variety Needed: Ongoing discussions about repeated zones highlighting issues in competitive integrity.

Final Thoughts

As teams gear up for their next matches, the urgency for adjustments becomes clear. Will they respond to community feedback in order to regain balance and excitement? The community is closely monitoring, eager to see evolution in strategies and performances.