Home
/
AAA games
/
Developer insights
/

Why arc damage should define expedition success now

Arc Damage Fuels Heated Debate on Expedition Success | Players Push for Change

By

Ethan Williams

Feb 6, 2026, 06:50 PM

Edited By

Maya Robinson

Updated

Feb 7, 2026, 12:49 AM

2 minutes of duration

Players showcasing strong gear emphasizing Arc damage during an expedition
popular

A recent surge in player discussions highlights a shift in how expedition success is defined, focusing on Arc damage over wealth amassed. This growing debate showcases mixed feelings about encouraging creative gameplay and the associated risks of monotonous combat.

The Shift in Focus

Players are vocal about their dissatisfaction with traditional gameplay dynamics. One participant noted, "People already contribute so much to the expedition and wipe all their progress," emphasizing the ineffectiveness of the current experience points system.

Calls for Improved Mechanics

Many gamers are urging developers to raise the level cap, arguing it would allow for more comprehensive skill tree development and better loadout customization. "The ability to craft my loadouts how I want and compete in trials is more important to me than anything else," expressed one player with extensive experience in the game.

Concerns from the Community

Not everyone supports the push for change. Some users worry about the potential for exhausting gameplay experiences. One player articulated, "The current system doesnโ€™t allow for fun," arguing against the hoarding mentality prevalent before wipes. This sentiment reflects a desire for engaging combat scenarios instead of repetitive play.

"It should encourage players to use the best kits they can afford," argued a participant, pointing out the contradictions in current gaming dynamics.

Diverging Opinions on Gear Use

While some players favor utilizing high-value kits for raids, others remain skeptical of the overall benefits. Discussions revealed a broader concern that hardcore players might undermine the experience for others, as illustrated by one comment: "Both hardcore PvPers and hardcore PvEers should never be put in charge of expedition requirements."

Key Points of Discussion

  • โœจ Skill Points Debate: The community is advocating for more meaningful skill rewards.

  • ๐Ÿ”„ Level Cap Concerns: Raising the cap could enhance gameplay variety.

  • ๐Ÿ’ญ Player Sentiment: Mixed feelings persist regarding current strategies and engagement levels.

As discussions evolve, players remain hopeful for changes that will better balance gameplay and encourage more active participation in raids. The communityโ€™s appetite for innovation reflects an eagerness to shape the future of gaming dynamics, despite fears of redundancy.

Stay updated on the conversations as they unfold and influence future gaming strategies.