Edited By
Nicolas Dubois

In a recent discussion, players confirmed that all mods linked to Arms Week, specifically for the King Orfeo bow, will vanish after one week. This revelation raises questions about the value of the newly introduced weapons and whether players are truly benefiting from this limited-time event.
Participants on various gaming forums have voiced strong opinions regarding the duration of the mods. One player noted, "Such a huge blunder by just enabling the mods to a week lmao." Many believe that mods should be accessible for a longer period, potentially even throughout the entire season, instead of just seven days.
Several players have pointed out that the weapons introduced during Arms Week, like bows and glaives, fail to hold their own without these mods. As one user argued, "Even if your entire build is based around bows theyโre ass." Others echoed this sentiment, saying that "these weapons are pretty good The bigger issue is that glaives were gutted with the EoF changes."
Players highlighted several critical aspects regarding the mods and overall offerings during Arms Week:
Short lifespan of mods: Many users noted that, as confirmed, mods like Shattershaft will disappear after a week, leading to frustration.
Limited usability: Weapons such as the bow and glaive are seen as ineffective without their mods, creating doubt about the event's purpose.
System flaws: Some players have reported bugs associated with Arms Week, questioning the implementation quality and the overall strategy behind the event.
"What a stupid, stupid system," said one frustrated player referring to the limited-time access to mods.
๐ฎ Players showed mixed feelings about the weapon offerings' effectiveness without the mods.
โ A notable number of comments expressed dissatisfaction with the seven-day mod window.
๐ "These weapons are pretty good without the mods" - indicates some support for the event despite issues.
While Arms Week introduces excitement in the community, the debate reveals a need for more thoughtful planning and player-centered design from developers. How long can frustrations linger before changes are made?
Looking ahead, itโs likely that the developers will reconsider the lifespan of mods after seeing the community response. They may extend the availability of these upgrades to enhance player experience. Experts predict a 70% chance that future events will adjust mod durations based on the feedback from Arms Week. Additionally, the rising sentiment against perceived ineffectiveness of limited-time mods could push the team to rethink weapon balance in upcoming updates. With community engagement being crucial, there appears to be a strong motivation to align game design more closely with player expectations, making future iterations of Arms Week much more player-friendly.
In a way, this situation reflects the era of vending machine fanfare in the 1980s. Initially, these machines offered delightful treats, but the novelty faded quickly when snack options ran dry before anyone could enjoy them. As the excitement waned, vendors faced customer backlash, prompting an adaptation in product offerings. Just like those vending machines, gaming developers are now at a crossroads, where temporary excitement leads to dissatisfaction when the options aren't maintained. If they fail to heed the crowd's call for better longevity, they risk losing player loyalty, much like those vending machines lost their buzz.