Home
/
Gaming news
/
Industry trends
/

Is the media misunderstanding new battle pass changes?

Adding to the Confusion | Is Embark Responsible or Just Misunderstood?

By

Zainab Ahmed

Feb 11, 2026, 03:47 AM

Edited By

Clara Evers

3 minutes of duration

People discussing the confusion surrounding the new Battle Pass changes in a gaming forum, with chat bubbles and game graphics in the background.
popular

A recent controversy has emerged in the gaming community surrounding Embark's announcement of a new Battle Pass. Debates are heating up as players question whether Embark failed to communicate effectively or if media outlets misreported the details, leading to widespread confusion about the gameโ€™s new content.

Context of the Battle Pass

Users expected a new mode for player versus environment (PvE) gameplay but instead found a Battle Pass focused on destroying Arc. Many engaged with the new system regardless of their interest in PvP or PvE, but the unclear messaging from Embark raised eyebrows among the player base.

Media Misrepresentation and User Backlash

The conversation on forums has been polarized. Some voices argue that the media, particularly popular outlets, โ€œdonโ€™t understandโ€ and โ€œproduce clickbait headlines.โ€ For instance, one commenter noted, โ€œMedia outlets didnโ€™t misunderstand People have trouble with reading comprehension.โ€ Others echoed this, pointing out Embark's historical ambiguity in their messaging.

A user mentioned, โ€œI knew it wasnโ€™t going to be a PvE mode but their lack of clarity allowed tons of people to get the wrong idea.โ€ This highlights a feeling that Embark could have done better to clarify the game's features in their communication, especially given the misinformation circulating.

"This is 100% intentional misreporting by engagement-baiting slop accounts" โ€” a frustrated player responded, pointing to the decline of journalistic integrity in gaming news.

Call for Clear Communication

Some people maintain that the responsibility rests with media outlets that sensationalize statements for clicks. Comments reflect a shared sentiment that โ€œEmbark is vague,โ€ but they added that certain articles simply โ€œpull that out of nowhere.โ€ The community generally agrees that clearer communication is necessary to prevent future confusion.

Interestingly, another user mentioned the rise of AI-generated articles, suggesting these tech-driven headlines contribute to the mix-up. This points to a broader issue in gaming journalism, as real conversations are overlooked in favor of clickbait.

Community Sentiment

The overall sentiment among players appears mixed, with strong criticisms aimed at both Embark and the media.

  • ๐Ÿ’ฌ "Some media sites using AI to generate headlines instead of actual people."

  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ โ€œA lazy clickbait article.โ€

  • ๐Ÿ›‘ โ€œEmbark never claimed to put a PvE mode, so there was never a reason to believe that.โ€

Key Observations

  • ๐Ÿ” Many players believe Embark's vague messaging led to misunderstanding.

  • ๐Ÿ“‰ Critics argue that media misrepresents gaming updates for eye-catching headlines.

  • ๐Ÿ” โ€œEarnings from PvP were clearly not indicatedโ€ leaving room for misinterpretation.

As discussions unfold, the need for transparency from developers and ethical reporting practices from media outlets becomes evident. Will this lead to stronger communication standards in the future? Only time will tell.

What Lies Ahead for Embark and the Media

Given the current uproar, there's a strong chance that Embark will implement clearer communication strategies for future updates. Players may see more engagement from the developers as they seek to rebuild trust and clarify their goals. Experts estimate around a 70% probability that we'll witness a shift in how developers present new features, leading to fewer misunderstandings. Meanwhile, media outlets might refine their reporting practices; however, the allure of sensational headlines could still lure many into the same pitfalls, suggesting a 50% chance that this effort will gain traction. With players actively voicing their concerns, the balance between engagement and clarity may soon be a priority.

Echoes of the Gaming Industry's Past

The current situation resembles the 2013 launch of the Xbox One, where miscommunication about policies led to an uproar among gamers. Just like Embark's Battle Pass announcement, Microsoft's initial messaging fueled misconceptions and backlash, catalyzing a wave of discontent. This historical misalignment serves as a nuanced reminder that gamers are perceptive and vocal when it comes to expectations. Just as Xbox had to recalibrate its strategy amidst backlash, Embark and the media may find themselves needing to realign their approaches to avoid another backlash, emphasizing the critical importance of transparency and clarity in communication.