Edited By
David Brown
Despite fears of decline, both Battlefield 5 and Battlefield 1 appear to maintain solid player bases. Gamers express satisfaction in forums, reporting active games at all hours.
Recent discussions have sparked controversy about the longevity of these popular shooters. Commenters on user boards highlighted their ongoing enjoyment of Battlefield 1, while some admitted frustration with Battlefield 5.
Active Player Count: Many players report finding full servers at all times, indicating continued interest.
Gameplay Experience: Battlefield 1 enjoys a slight edge, with players specifically noting its atmospheric gameplay.
Frustration over History: Some gamers voiced discontent with how Battlefield 5 handles historical context.
"Always people playing any time I log in. Still fun and look great!"
Players highlight their favorite experiences, with one saying, "Iโve been getting consistent TDM rush and conquest games in BF1 recently." Interestingly, some users had issues finding matches on console platforms, but the atmosphere and gameplay of 1 seem to keep it afloat.
User sentiment leans positive. Many reports confirm vibrant communities:
Battlefield 1: "It's pretty much alive!"
Battlefield 5: "Makes me mad Fucks with my countryโs history."
๐ข Active servers reported for both titles, showing that neither is in danger of fading.
๐ต Battlefield 1 remains a favorite among players, with rich gameplay.
โ ๏ธ Some unrest about historical accuracy in Battlefield 5 affecting player sentiment.
With active forums discussing these titles, it seems the Battlefield franchise still holds a place in the hearts of many gamers. Will these series continue to thrive, or are they merely treading water?