Edited By
Omar Ali

Gamers are facing confusion over optimal refresh rates on PC, particularly with monitors like the Gigabyte M27Q, which supports a maximum of 165hz. With many games capped at 60fps, the results have some users asking: Should I stick with 60hz for the best performance?
Recently, one user noticed discrepancies while playing Yakuza Like a Dragon at 165hz. Despite G-Sync being enabled, their monitor fluctuated around 60hz instead of holding steady. This discrepancy has sparked debate: what refresh rate should players choose when gaming at 60fps or lower?
Three key themes emerged from the discussion among gamers:
Importance of G-Sync: "If youโre using sync, why should it matter?" One user pointed out that as long as G-Sync is enabled, variations in refresh rate shouldn't be noticeable.
Frame Pacing Issues: A commenter noted that "165 does not evenly divide by 60," suggesting potential frame pacing problems at higher refresh rates without effective syncing.
Performance Specs Matter: Participants requested the PC specs (like GPU and CPU) to analyze if hardware might affect performance more than the monitor.
"Keep G-Sync on and cap the frame rate to 60 using the Nvidia control panel."
"Worst case, set it to 120 since itโs still an even multiple."
"Does VRR also work for 30fps?"
The sentiment in the comments varies widely, but there appears to be consensus that using G-Sync is crucial in mitigating refresh rate discrepancies.
๐ฅ๏ธ Monitor refresh rates can fluctuate under certain conditions, even with syncing enabled.
โก For non-60fps games, a 120hz refresh rate might offer a suitable compromise.
โ Some gamers wonder if VRR effectively supports 30fps games.
Ultimately, while a 165hz refresh rate seems ideal, the switch to 60hz or 120hz might prove beneficial under specific conditions, making this a hot topic among PC gamers.