Edited By
Leo Zhang

A wave of discussion has erupted online about Blizzard Entertainmentโs history with Dota. Comments from people reveal both relief and intrigue regarding what might have happened had Blizzard entered the MOBA scene more aggressively. The sentiment is split but the nostalgia runs deep.
People ponder the massive implications had Blizzard acquired Dota. One commenter remarked, "Imagine when you click Dota in Steam and it opens Battle.net launcher nightmare!" This sentiment indicates widespread agreement that such a move could have drastically altered the gaming landscape.
Despite the absence of details about Blizzard's past intentions, the impact of its decisions is not lost on fans. Many feel that the current state of Dota owes much to Valve's stewardship. "No other company could've done for Dota what Valve has over the years," a user stated, underscoring Valve's essential role in Dota's success.
A mix of relief and recognition shapes user discussions:
Missed Opportunity? Some believe that Blizzard failed to capitalize on a potentially lucrative venture with Dota.
A Better Alternative? The majority feel grateful for Valveโs management style, suggesting it fostered a more robust gaming experience.
HotS vs. Dota: Discussions shifted toward Heroes of the Storm (HotS), where one user noted, "HotS is great, and monetization wasnโt bad," highlighting how Blizzard's approach differs significantly from other games in the genre.
"Dota is one of the most played multiplayer titles out there," another comment noted, hinting at its enduring popularity despite challenges.
๐ Reactions Mixed: Forums reveal a blend of relief and curiosity.
๐ฅ Gratitude for Valve: Users credit Valve for Dotaโs sustained successes.
๐ Potential vs. Reality: Many saw Blizzard's hypothetical involvement as a missed opportunity.
Conversations around Blizzardโs choices continue to shape how fans view their cherished titles today, revealing an unending fascination with the paths not taken.