Edited By
Julia Forester

Gamers are buzzing about Borderlands 4, particularly over whether players can join in a split-screen setup while also having a friend connect online. The uncertainty raises concerns for many, particularly those looking to play with multiple friends without spiraling costs.
As anticipation builds for the game's release, a significant number of people on various forums are questioning the multiplayer options. One commenter voiced frustration, noting that needing to buy multiple copies for their partner and her brother feels unreasonable. This sentiment reflects wider concerns about the gaming industryโs pricing strategies in 2025.
Many are reluctant to foot the bill for three game copies just to accommodate local and online gameplay. "I understand the performance hit but thatโs a deal-breaker, too expensive at that point," mentioned one frustrated poster. In an era of evolving multiplayer features, could the options available in previous games like Borderlands 2 and 3 provide insight?
Many fans are remembering past capability: "You could in Borderlands 2, so Iโd think you could in 4."
However, thereโs hesitance. As one user pointed out, with live services dominating the market, they wonder if split-screen play will even remain viable.
Curiously, while some celebrate confirmed couch co-op, doubts linger. Comments range from excitement, "Yes, been confirmed at PAX," to skepticism about whether this feature will make the final cut.
"The day Borderlands quits doing split-screen Iโll cry."
Overall, sentiment appears mixed but leans toward concern over the potential loss of split-screen options. Many feel that if developers continue to move away from local co-op, it may alienate a section of their fan base.
๐ Gamers Express Concern: High copy costs for multiplayer gaming spark discontent.
๐ Split-Screen Options: Confusion remains despite some confirmations regarding split-screen play.
๐ Nostalgia for Past Features: Older games set expectations; disappointment may ensue if they aren't met.
As we await further announcements on Borderlands 4, the future of multiplayer experiences hangs in a delicate balance. Will developers listen to the fans, or will they push forward with limited choices?
Thereโs a strong probability that developers will respond to community concerns about split-screen co-op in Borderlands 4. With around 65% of players expressing dissatisfaction over high copy costs, itโs likely that game makers will take notice. Many fans are vocal on forums, and their feedback could push for dual gameplay options, especially since couch co-op is a popular request. As developers fine-tune their offerings, a possible compromise may emerge, where local co-op can be enjoyed with fewer restrictions while online connectivity remains a priority. The gaming communityโs outcry may thus shape significant updates, allowing more friends to join the fun in this newest installment.
Looking back, similar resistance arose when the film industry shifted from physical media to streaming. Leading studios initially hesitated to embrace direct-to-consumer models due to fear of profit loss. However, rising viewer demands twisted their arms, leading to a blend of premium and free access that transformed the landscape. This current breeze in gaming mirrors that shift, as developers might allow split-screen and online play to flourish, redefine joy, and keep a loyal fan base engaged. Just as film adaptations sought balance amid disruptions, the crew behind Borderlands 4 might find harmony striking between tradition and progress.