Home
/
AAA games
/
Franchise updates
/

Brutal john 2: why the name change raises questions

A name change from Brutal John to Brutal John 2 is stirring up confusion among gamers. Developers say the new title highlights the addition of a second playable character, Brutal Dog, but many players feel it misrepresents the game and creates sequel misconceptions.

By

Kota Yamamoto

Apr 30, 2025, 07:19 PM

Edited By

Samir Patel

Updated

May 2, 2025, 08:52 PM

Snappy read

Cover of Brutal John 2 featuring Brutal John and Brutal Dog, highlighting their intense stance ready for action.

The Core of the Controversy

Despite the developers' reasoning, many players are uncertain about the choice. "Itโ€™s just confusing; I think it makes it funnier," mentioned one fan, reflecting a sentiment shared by others. A user even compared the situation to titles like Goat Simulator 3 and The Eternal Castle [REMASTERED].

Interestingly, one commenter questioned, "Is there any real prototype of Brutal John?" This adds a layer of curiosity regarding the gameโ€™s development status. The developers are under pressure to clarify their intentions as expectations rise.

Reactions from the Community

Players are expressing diverse opinions on this name change:

  • Some believe the label is misleading, calling it "not exactly groundbreaking, but"

  • Others are still excited about gameplay, looking forward to the launch on July 22, 2025.

  • A few wish the title would revert back, sharing thoughts like, "Hope they change it back."

  • An anonymous commenter shared, "Brutal Johns 2ing"โ€”a humorous take on the titleโ€™s oddity.

"Itโ€™s super duper confusing, but the game looks great," said a hopeful participant.

Key Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿ”น Many are puzzled by the name change, wondering if it conveys a sequel.

  • ๐Ÿ”ธ Fans are curious if a real prototype of the game exists.

  • ๐Ÿ”บ Excitement builds as the release date approaches.

The Road Ahead

As the community continues to voice their reactions, the developers will likely have to address any lingering doubts or concerns about branding clarity. The path to July 2025 will be crucial in determining player perception and satisfaction. Will they bridge the naming gap before the game hits the shelves?