Edited By
Dominic Crown
A heated discussion has erupted in online forums about whether a Monk character can use spells from a newly found Spellbook and an Amulet. This debate highlights ongoing conflicts among players about class abilities and the essence of the game.
In a recent gamer inquiry, a Monk player named Tiefling raised questions about potential spellcasting capabilities. The Monk, who follows the Way of the Open Hand, discovered items that traditionally empower spellcasters. Yet, as discussions unfolded, players pointed out that Monks lack innate spellcasting abilities, thus raising eyebrows.
"As an open hand monk, you donโt have the class ability to cast spellsthe spells from their race are more like innate abilities," a comment noted.
Three primary themes have surfaced in the ongoing conversation:
Class Restrictions: Players detailed that Monks, especially those of the Open Hand subclass, cannot learn spells unless stated by their race.
Item Misplacement: Many speculate that the items in question are tailored for spellcasting classes, not Monks.
Advice for Collaboration: Several commenters urged the original poster to approach their DM for discussing spellcasting desires, emphasizing teamwork in storytelling.
"Talk to your DM, but I wouldn't approach saying 'I want that spell book'," advised another.
Interestingly, the Monk's struggles during a recent battle โ involving a pesky Fire Elemental โ prompted these questions. "I had a light crossbow but broke it on a bad roll, so spells seemed like the answer to help my team," they explained.
๐ Many assert that Monks need specific feats or items to cast spells.
โ๏ธ The discussion showcases the need for players to balance martial skills with potential magic.
๐ฌ "Iโd love to have some spell casting ability" resonates with many.
The debate continues as the Monk's player prepares to have a crucial conversation with their DM, aiming for clarity and collaboration.