Edited By
Darius Kingston

A recent incident involving code 3475 has triggered confusion among chess enthusiasts. After using this code along with a specific chess board setup, users report unexpected and corrupted results, raising questions about data integrity in online chess environments.
On April 30, 2025, users began testing code 3475 alongside a particular board configuration, pbRpqBrp/B6B/k6n/p6p/N6k/b6b/K6N/BbRkQNrq. Instead of the expected output, the results have perplexed many. One user commented, "Donโt know what the next step, if any, could be."
As users gather on various forums to discuss their findings, three main themes are emerging:
Data Collation: Many are rallying to piece together data to understand the discrepancies better.
"Currently these sets of data are being collated here so we can get an idea for what each code returns," one participant noted.
Upload Issues: Some users report difficulties in uploading their own data, solely able to view existing correlations.
"Iโve been trying, but I canโt actually upload my data to this, only view it."
Code Coverage Inquiry: Questions arise regarding whether all possible entries have been recorded and tested.
One user asked, "Do we know if there is an entry for all 4096 possible entries yet?"
Here are some notable remarks from community discussions:
"This just proves how unpredictable online chess can be; we need better systems."
Frustrations run high among users grappling with these results, blending confusion with determination. The urgency is palpable as they seek clarity.
๐ A push is on for complete data sets to analyze code 3475
โ Upload issues hamper usersโ progress, limiting self-testing capabilities
๐ Thereโs uncertainty if all 4096 codes have been addressed
In light of the ongoing dialogue, chess.com may need to analyze its data protocols and possibly re-evaluate how it processes user-generated data. As this situation evolves, the chess community eagerly looks for answers.