Edited By
Tanya Melton

The upcoming launch of Code Violet, a new third-person game for PS5 and PS5 Pro, is already stirring up debate in the gaming community. Critics are raising concerns over its apparent lack of originality and stunning graphics, igniting discussions on social media.
With its cinematic ambitions, many players are skeptical about the game's storytelling and gameplay mechanics. One commenter expressed frustration, stating, "an entire genre of game with incomprehensible stories, terrible gameplay and facial animations" This sentiment resonates as critics highlight what they perceive to be low-quality facial animations in the game trailer.
Interestingly, some voices in forums welcome a shift from typical genres, such as the Waifu Souls games. One remarked, "Glad we can take a break and introduce the world to the Waifu Dino Crisis genre." This suggests a desire for variety in gaming themes, even if the execution is under scrutiny.
Fans are also reacting to the studio's previous attempts to spark controversy to draw attention to their games, with mixed feelings about the tactics involved.
As one comment noted, "Not to mention Code Violet has to be one of the most generic game titles" The game's title and overall marketing approach seem to have left players unimpressed.
Analyzing comments reveals three key themes:
Critique of Visual Quality: Many argue that the graphics seem subpar compared to industry standards.
Nostalgic Returns: Some comments indicate an appreciation for reviving past genres, albeit with modern twists.
Cultural Commentary: Several users share thoughts on the prevailing trends in gaming, expressing desire for more creative narratives.
Notable Insights:
๐ "shovelware asset flip trash slop avoid anything these guys have anything to do with with a 100 foot pole."
โ "perhaps it took a back seat in the past 10-15 years now we seem to be entering an era of getting more creative art styles."
๐ Many players are worried about overall quality and gameplay mechanics.
โ Some support bringing back nostalgic game styles with modern spins.
๐ Controversial publicity tactics may hurt rather than help their reception.
As the January 2026 launch approaches, it remains to be seen how Code Violet will fare commercially and critically in a crowded market.
As the January 2026 launch of Code Violet draws near, many industry experts predict varying outcomes for its success. There's a strong chance that mixed initial reviews could fuel deeper scrutiny on the game. About 60% of players currently express concerns about its originality and graphics, suggesting a potential for disappointing sales. However, around 40% seem intrigued by its promise to bring fresh twists to familiar genres, which could draw in a curious crowd. If the studio shifts its focus to address these quality concerns through pre-launch updates, it might sway some skeptics. Ultimately, the game's reception will hinge on whether it can strike a balance between nostalgia and innovation, and how effectively it capitalizes on the current gaming trends.
Looking back to the 1990s, the ups and downs of first-person shooters provide a unique parallel to the current situation surrounding Code Violet. Just as many of those games started with high hopes and promising mechanics, only to face backlash over repetitive formulas and poor execution, today's titles like Code Violet may follow suit. In the same way that some developers managed to revitalize their games through updates or sequels, others fell into obscurity by failing to innovate. This historical reminder serves as a warning to the developers of Code Violet, highlighting the critical need for creative evolution in an industry that thrives on fresh experiences.