Home
/
Gaming news
/
Industry trends
/

Exposing collective shout's censorship and hypocrisy

Growing Criticism of Collective Shout | Targeting Games and Hypocrisy Exposed

By

Kamara Nascimento

Jul 22, 2025, 01:57 PM

Edited By

Clara Evers

2 minutes of duration

Group of people holding signs against censorship in gaming, showing solidarity and frustration with Collective Shout's actions
popular

A wave of concern is rising among gamers and advocates alike as Collective Shout faces backlash for its controversial actions against video games, particularly in targeting titles like Detroit: Become Human and GTA V. Critics label its methods as both hypocritical and aggressive.

Collective Shout's Double Standards

Collective Shout claims to advocate for the rights of women and children but is accused of hypocrisy by critics.

One significant point of contention is their support for Cuties, a film seen by many as inappropriate for its themes involving minors. "They pride themselves on defending sexualization of women and girls, and then defend a show that did exactly that to kids," one commenter stated.

Additionally, their campaigns to censor video games are raising alarms. They successfully had GTA V banned from Australian retailers like Target and K-Mart, and even pressured a local bakery to remove a slogan deemed inappropriate.

Bullying Tactics and Community Reactions

Critics are vocal about the tactics Collective Shout employs. Many describe their approach as bullying, effectively coercing businesses to comply with their demands. A user expressed, "Aren't all activist groups like this?" showing a mix of frustration and concern.

There is also a deeper sentiment at play among gamers. Many believe Collective Shout's actions pose a threat not only to gaming but to free expression. One passionate commenter urged fellow gamers to contact their representatives to support legislation that counters the pressure that organizations like Collective Shout exert on game developers and retailers.

Voices in the Community

Among the varied responses, three main themes emerged:

  • Hypocrisy: Many highlighted the contradiction between Collective Shout's stated goals and its support of problematic media.

  • Bullying: Users echoed sentiments about the organization coercing others into compliance.

  • Activism: There is a call-to-action for gamers to unite and push back against the perceived censorship of their hobby.

"We need to push back against Collective Shout. We're literally letting a whole company that endangers kids push to remove games from platforms." - Anonymous commenter

Key Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿšซ Collective Shout's Campaigns: Successfully banned GTA V from major Australian retailers.

  • ๐Ÿ’ฌ Community Sentiment: Mixed emotions with significant pushback against censorship tactics.

  • ๐ŸŽฎ Call to Action: Gamers encouraged to support legislative changes.

Future Scenarios in the Gaming Sphere

Thereโ€™s a strong chance that Collective Shoutโ€™s actions will prompt a broader push for game industry regulations and protection for creative freedoms. As more people express their concerns, lawmakers may feel pressure to craft legislation balancing advocacy with artistic expression. Experts estimate around a 60% probability that game developers will band together to protect their works, likely resulting in the formation of coalitions aimed at countering censorship. Consumers might see new platforms emerge, catering specifically to those seeking unfiltered content, which could reshape the gaming landscape significantly.

A Unique Historical Echo

This situation draws an intriguing parallel to the censorship faced by comic book publishers in the 1950s, particularly the rise of the Comics Code Authority. Just as Collective Shout sparks fears of overreach in gaming, the comic industry faced pressures that stifled creativity and prevented diverse storytelling. In both cases, a vocal minority sought to exert influence, ultimately creating a backlash that fostered underground movements. This history suggests that the current conflict may not just end in defeat for one side; it could lead to a stronger, more resilient gaming community championing freedom of expression.