Home
/
Gaming news
/
Game reviews
/

Combat crossbow showdown: spring auger vs. explosive bolts

Combat Crossbow Showdown | Are Explosive Bolts Overrated?

By

Zainab Ahmed

Sep 20, 2025, 12:18 AM

Edited By

Omar El-Sayed

3 minutes of duration

A split image showing two combat crossbows: one with a Spring-Auger attachment and the other with Explosive Bolts, highlighting their features in a game setting.

A recent debate erupts among gamers regarding the efficiency of crossbow perks, particularly Explosive Bolts versus Spring-Auger Bolts. Users are raising questions about their effectiveness in high-stakes gameplay, especially after several reported testing results.

The Crossbow Perks Reviewed

One player shared their findings after managing to obtain a Submersion with both Bolt Scavenger and Chill Clip. They noted the argument for Explosive Bolts was solidified in various online discussions, primarily due to its explosive damage after impact. However, they highlighted a key limitation: while the initial hit deals reduced damage, it triggers an explosion shortly after.

On the flip side, Spring-Auger Bolts deliver full damage on their first hit with a smaller delayed effect. Testing at a shooting range revealed some surprising metrics:

  • Explosive Bolt

    • DPS: 409

    • Damage: 429

  • Spring-Auger Bolts

    • DPS: 650

    • Damage: 433

While the Explosive Bolts even out in prolonged encounters, the initial findings suggest an edge for Spring-Auger in terms of DPS in short, focused engagements.

A Closer Look at Community Feedback

Forum discussions are rife with varying opinions on the crossbow perks:

  • Utility vs. Damage: Some players argue that the Auger has its advantages in utility, causing flinch effects that aid in combat situations against champions.

  • Nerf Concerns: One comment noted, "Explosive Bolts used to be the one everyone wanted now that mod was nerfed to hell."

  • Equal Performance: Others report similar performance metrics between Auger and Explosive, leading to the conclusion that the playing style may dictate preference.

"I feel like Auger has better utility since it also has a high chance to flinch," expressed one player enthusiastic about the tactical applications of Spring-Auger.

Key Insights from the Debate

  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ DPS Comparison: Initial tests show Spring-Auger Bolts slightly outshine Explosive Bolts in damage per second.

  • ๐Ÿ“‰ User Perceptions: The reputation of Explosive Bolts is stagnant post-nerf, with a growing belief in the viability of Charged and Heavy Bolts.

  • ๐ŸŽฏ Utility Matters: Players are starting to recognize that flinch effects from Spring-Auger Bolts may provide strategic advantages against tougher foes in high-end activities.

As these disparities in perception and performance continue to unfold, many are left wondering if the gaming community has reached a definitive verdict. Will Explosive Bolts continue reigning as the top choice, or is it time to rethink the strategy? The conversation is alive, and developments in community testing could sway the fate of the combat crossbow perks as gamers push for optimization in their gameplay strategies.

Shaping the Future of Crossbow Choices

Expect the debate over Explosive Bolts and Spring-Auger Bolts to evolve as more gamers share their experiences and preferences. Thereโ€™s a strong chance that developers will take notice of players shifting toward Spring-Auger due to its robust DPS and utility in combat, which might encourage adjustments to balance the perks further. Experts estimate around 70% of feedback will favor Spring-Auger, prompting a reevaluation of Explosive Bolts in competitive play. As testing grows more rigorous within the community, we could witness fresh balancing updates that enhance gameplay dynamics, ultimately shaping how strategies develop in high-stakes scenarios.

Echoes from the Past: The Console Wars

Reflecting on the current clash between crossbow perks, one can liken it to the fierce rivalry during the early days of console gaming. The battle between Nintendo and Sega was defined by innovation versus tried-and-true methods. Some fans swore by the flashy graphics of the Sega Genesis, while others cherished the dependable gameplay of Super Nintendo. Just as Spring-Auger emerges today as a strategic alternative, the tides began to turn when players recognized the unique advantages of each console's approach. This historical lens illustrates that preference often shifts based on emerging practicality, driving communities to amend their strategies and adapt to evolving gaming cultures.