
A player claims to have finished The Witcher 3 and its expansions in just 53 hours, sparking intense debate among the gaming community. Comments on various forums express disbelief and highlight concerns about missing crucial content, raising questions about diverse play styles.
The playerโs claim ignited discussions on approaching the game differently. Critics point out that speedrunning may bypass significant narrative and gameplay elements. The ongoing dialogues emphasize how varied experiences shape oneโs connection to a game.
Rushed Gameplay Concerns
Many players believe that a 53-hour run means vital elements were skipped. One user remarked, "53 hours is very rushed for such a masterpiece."
Skipped Content Critique
Comments show disappointment over potential missed quests and cutscenes. As one player put it, "Did you skip every cutscene and dialogue and side quests?" Another noted, "Iโm 21 hours in and have spent 20 hours in White Orchard!" This indicates a stark contrast to the speed run.
Different Playstyles
Gamers shared their own experiences, underscoring the richness of the game's world. A comment stated, "My first was 260 hours. I just did everything there was."
"This is what they call 'a wrong way to play.'" - A critical comment from the forum.
The feedback is largely negative, with many players questioning the quality of such a rushed experience. They argue for a deeper engagement with the game.
๐ Many believe rushing misses the point of the game.
๐ Players express concerns about not appreciating the experience.
๐ฎ "Did you ignore all of the side quests?" highlights frustrations with the speedrun.
As the conversation continues, it's clear that a segment of the gaming community advocates for taking the time to enjoy intricate narratives and the lush environments that define The Witcher 3. Expect conversations about game pacing to grow, suggesting a potential shift in player preferences towards enjoying extensive gameplay rather than racing through it.