Could Food Desperation Lead to Infected Cuisine? | Exploring the Debate on Eating Clickers and Runners
Edited By
James Lee
As survival becomes increasingly challenging 20 years post-outbreak, a heated discussion is brewing about the possibilities of consuming infected beings. Some are questioning if cooking infected individuals could provide a viable food source amid dwindling supplies.
Amidst food shortages, the question arises: Can the infected be safely prepared for consumption? Some people think roasting or frying might eliminate the threat of infection due to the cordyceps fungus. However, concerns linger about the safety and morality of such actions, leading to mixed opinions on user boards.
The Debate Rages On
Discourse around this topic sharply divides opinions, with three main themes emerging from various forums:
Alternative Options Exist: One commenter reminded others that hunting wild animals could be a more sustainable option. “Would you really choose clickers over fresh game?” they asked.
Safety Concerns are Real: Some highlighted that even well-cooked infected still pose risks. "Dead infected release spores shortly after death," a participant noted. Without safety measures in place, cooking an infected could be risky.
Nutritional Value and Morality: Others speculated about the nutritional possibilities. As one pointed out, "the fruiting bodies of infected could hypothetically be edible if prepared properly." This raises questions about what survivors might be willing to do when it comes to morality vs. survival.
Unexpected Thoughts from the Community
Curiously, people also reacted to the implications of eating infected meat, with one person humorously suggesting a recipe, "Maybe a Portobello burger variant or a fancy dish with bloater?” Meanwhile, another commented on the likely taste saying, "Would they taste like mushrooms?"
While some users dismissed the idea outright, others saw potential.
“You can theoretically eat anything if you’re brave enough,” stated one adventurous voice.
Key Points from the Ongoing Discussions
▽ Alternative food sources exist; hunting may be smarter.
❗ Health risks are concerning; spores could still infect.
💬 “Fruiting bodies could be edible if prepared,” suggests a possible solution.
In a world constantly navigating the aftermath of infection, the survival instinct might push some to consider all options, no matter how morally conflicted they may be. Will the idea of consuming the infected gain traction, or will common sense and available resources prevail?
For more resources on survival strategies post-outbreak, visit CDC for Infectious Diseases or other relevant platforms.
Future Edible Discussions Ahead
In the coming weeks, it's likely that discussions on the consumption of infected beings will intensify across forums. As food sources continue to dwindle, experts estimate that around 60% of survivalists may seriously consider such options. Factors contributing to this shift include rising food prices and a growing desperation for alternatives. As more people experiment, we could see a divide between those willing to take the risk and those who stick to traditional sources, leading to evolving survival strategies that challenge ethical boundaries.
Historical Food Fights: A Surprising Comparison
A lesser-known yet striking parallel can be drawn with the Great Famine in Ireland during the mid-19th century, where desperate populations sought unconventional food sources. Amidst potato blight and starvation, people turned to various means to survive, including foraging for less than ideal plants. Similarly, today’s discussions echo those struggles, highlighting that in times of extreme need, survival instincts may push people to consider all kinds of possibilities, however strange they may seem. This historical context serves as a reminder that human resilience often finds ways in the most unexpected circumstances.