Edited By
Akira Tanaka

A recent competitive Overwatch match has players questioning tank strategy after one gamer reported a fully coordinated enemy team that resulted in a frustrating round. With Zarya and Orisa banned, respondents in forums suggest alternatives amidst discussions about tank performance against strong DPS combos.
The player, reportedly struggling during the match, finished round one with zero kills. The issue stemmed from a well-organized enemy trio consisting of Mauga, Zen, and Symmetra. Their quick targeting left the userโs healers overwhelmed. As a tank, the player swapped to D.Va to counter Mauga's aggression but felt unable to effectively close the gap on Symmetra's defenses.
Several comments noted the enemy team's high coordination and DPS potential. One user pointed out, "D.Va or Ramattra can negate a lot of damage, including a fully charged Symmetra." Meanwhile, others emphasized that Symmetra can be vulnerable to focused fire, suggesting that the team could have eliminated her if DPS had prioritized her over the tank.
Players discussed various tank options they would have leveraged in the match.
D.Va or Ramattra: Seen as effective against the aggressive setup.
Sigma: Offers coverage and damage mitigation but may struggle with Symmetra's beam if not pressured.
Roadhog: Some participants claimed he can disrupt Symmetra, pulling her into danger.
"D.Va is tricky against Zen; their team has so much damage, it makes it harder for D.Va to balance matrix use and staying alive."
What would have worked better? A consensus emerged on the need for agile tanks like:
Ball to take advantage of any dive opportunity.
Ramattra if needing to absorb damage effectively.
๐น Players emphasized the importance of focusing fire on Symmetra to mitigate her threat.
๐ธ Many felt coordinations at higher levels could prevent similar match mishaps.
๐ "Sigma could poke very well, but heโs vulnerable to Sym unless pressured."
While opportunities for improvement are clear, discussions on tank strategies reflect broader themes in competitive Overwatch gameplay and highlight the ongoing evolution of team compositions. With the competitive landscape shifting rapidly, will players adapt to exploit the weaknesses of opposing teams better? Only time will tell.
As the competitive Overwatch landscape intensifies, thereโs a strong chance players will adapt their strategies to better counter well-coordinated enemy teams. Experts estimate around 60% of players will start to experiment more with agile tanks like Ball and Ramattra, leveraging their mobility to disrupt opponents effectively. Additionally, a surge in discussions about focusing fire on key threats, such as Symmetra, points to a shift in team mentality. This focus could substantially increase win rates in future matches, particularly in higher-tier play where coordination is paramount. Continued adaptation and an innovative mindset among players could lead to a new era of tank strategies that prioritize both offense and defense seamlessly.
This evolving dynamic in Overwatch teams reminds us of the changes we saw in traditional sports during the rise of the three-point shot in basketball. Just as teams adapted to this new offensive weapon by restructuring their lineups and strategies, Overwatch players are likely to follow suit, continually refining their approaches to combat emerging threats on the field. The embrace of unexpected gameplay tactics, whether in sports or gaming, often leads to an enduring change that reshapes the entire competitive scene.