Edited By
David Brown

Gamers are fired up about the lack of multiplayer in Dark Ages, stirring a heated discussion online. Many express disappointment, arguing that without multiplayer, one of gaming's beloved genres loses its edge.
The recent announcement regarding Dark Agesโs focus on single-player has split opinion. Some gamers cherish the game's campaign structure, while others lament the loss of multiplayer features that resonated with them in previous titles.
"Doom has never really been about the multiplayer."
Feedback on forums ranges widely:
Some gamers appreciate the return to single-player, stating that the campaign is what they value most.
Others wish for the multiplayer structure similar to 2016's version, which was packed with engaging features.
A few believe co-op modes could enhance gameplay without compromising the single-player experience.
One user noted how the previous title provided a wealth of content.
Conversely, another commented, "No multiplayer is great news," indicating a clear divide in preferences.
The conversation evokes a mixed sentiment. While many appreciate a focused single-player experience, a notable number of players wish for multiplayer to make a comeback.
โก 2016's multiplayer was praised, while Eternal's left much to be desired.
๐ Many users seem to prefer a well-rounded single-player campaign over add-ons like multiplayer.
๐ฌ "I personally would rather have a 22-level single player campaign than 11 level with a multiplayerโฆ"
The discourse continues, raising the question: should future Doom releases prioritize multiplayer, or is it time to embrace the single-player legacy fully?
For continued updates on gaming and community feedback, check popular forums like GameSpot and IGN.
What are your thoughts on multiplayer in Doom? Should it make a return? Drop your take in the comments!