Edited By
Julia Forester
Some Discord users are voicing strong opposition to new age verification features that require face or ID scanning. This move is part of an effort to comply with UK and Australian regulations aimed at protecting children from harmful content.
Discord has announced that some users will need to scan their faces or IDs to verify their age when accessing sensitive content. This requirement is described as an "experiment" limited to users in the UK and Australia, where new laws mandate stricter age verification for platforms exposing minors to explicit material.
Interestingly, Discord states that it does not store biometric data or ID scans after verification. While this reassurance is in place, many remain skeptical about privacy implications.
Users have expressed concerns on forums, focusing on three main themes: privacy, compliance with laws, and the broader implications of surveillance.
"No face scanning and most of all no ID scanning unless extremely needed," a user remarked, reflecting fears over privacy.
Another participant pointed out, "Itโs not just a Discord issue. Other platforms will likely adopt these measures too."
Some voiced a bleak perspective, with one user noting, "As if the internet doesn't know all about us already" echoing the prevalent sentiment that this may just be a part of a larger trend toward invasive measures.
๐ซ Many users reject the idea of face and ID scanning due to privacy concerns.
๐ Age verification is driven by new regulations in the UK and Australia, emphasizing safety for minors.
๐ Digital rights groups warn of overreach, labeling such practices as detrimental to online freedom.
In light of these developments, it remains to be seen whether other platforms will follow suit or if users will push back against these invasive requirements. This ongoing story certainly raises questions about the balance between user safety and privacy in the digital age.