Dishonored Characters | New Critiques on Morality and Division

A recent forum debate has ramped up discussions on the morality of characters in the Dishonored franchise. Following Sokolov’s controversial character battle win, players have voiced escalating concerns about who among them truly deserves the title of "horrible person" within the game.

Character Controversies Heat Up

As players dissect character actions, criticism of Jindosh has reached new heights. Many consider him a villain due to his ruthless tactics, and the forums reflect a split sentiment.

Jindosh Under Fire

The recent comments reveal a mix of opinions regarding Jindosh, with some declaring, "He’s a jerk, but his ego is fun to watch." However, others assert he embodies true villainy. Notably, one player stated, "Sokolov literally has innocent civilians in cages, and he murders them with a painful plague." This highlights the debate surrounding not only Jindosh but also Sokolov’s unfavorable actions.

Granny Rags: Evil or Misunderstood?

According to newer commentary, opinions on Granny Rags remain consistent. Many persist in calling her an "evil witch," reinforcing the idea that helping her often leads to worse outcomes. One player commented, "For every decision involving her, choosing to assist is the morally worse option."

Paolo’s Complex Morality

Paolo continues to evoke discussion, with many labeling his actions as driven by survival rather than malice. A player noted, "Paolo did awful things, yet some defend him as a product of his environment." This complexity keeps the character at the center of discussions.

Community Reactions

The differing opinions in the forum underscore a blend of intrigue and disdain towards these characters. As one community member put it, "If divided opinions include the idea of love to hate, then my vote is squarely on Jindosh. He makes a fantastic target to hunt down and destroy."

Noteworthy Insights

• 🥊 Jindosh's villainy is debated, with mixed feelings about his ego.

• 🔪 Granny Rags remains largely viewed as irredeemably malevolent.

• 🌍 Paolo's actions invite a deeper exploration of survival over moral judgment.

As discussions unfold, will perceptions of these morally ambiguous characters shift as new narratives emerge in the series?