Home
/
AAA games
/
AAA game reviews
/

Doom (2016) vs eternal: which has better movement?

Should Gamers Choose Doom (2016) or Doom Eternal? | Fast-Paced Gameplay Debate

By

Jordan Figueroa

Jun 6, 2025, 12:46 PM

Edited By

David Brown

2 minutes of duration

A side-by-side view of Doom (2016) and Doom Eternal gameplay showing different movement styles and speeds
popular

A lively discussion has emerged among gamers concerning whether to choose Doom (2016) or Doom Eternal. Many seek clarity on which title offers superior movement and pace, as variables like player preference and gaming platform come into play.

Gameplay Pacing at the Heart of the Debate

With gamers keen for fast-paced action, the question of speed between these two titles is hotly contested. Sources indicate that opinions vary significantly:

  • Doom Eternal is touted for its rapid, dynamic gameplay, with one gamer noting, "Eternal if you want sweaty fast gameplay."

  • Conversely, some gamers found Doom (2016) to deliver a more enjoyable single-player experience, with a comment proclaiming it "a great single player game!"

The discussion hints at a divide in preferences based upon gaming styles. While some players favor the quick and brutal nature of Doom Eternal, others appreciate the structure and accessibility of Doom (2016).

Player Equipment Matters

Another element of this conversation revolves around the console used for gameplay. For those on a controller, players point out that Doom (2016) may offer a more tailored experience. One comment observed, "If ur on controller then I definitely recommend 2016 since eternal is NOT made for controllers." This indicates that control dynamics could impact overall enjoyment and accessibility.

Mixed Reviews on Features

While both games have their merits, players express varying opinions about features:

  • Doom (2016) players appreciate its straightforwardness and engaging single-player campaign.

  • Doom Eternal, however, has been criticized for extensive platforming sections that some find "tiresome."

Interestingly, individuals are not merely prioritizing graphics or weapon variety but are more concerned about movement fluidity and gameplay satisfaction.

Key Insights:

  • ๐Ÿš€ Eternal receives praise for faster gameplay.

  • ๐Ÿ•น๏ธ 2016 preferred by those using controllers for its responsiveness.

  • ๐ŸŽฎ Both games cater to different play styles and preferences, confirming a wide appeal in the Doom franchise.

The conversation continues to evolve as gamers weigh their options. What choice will they make? Only time will tell.

What Lies Ahead for Doom Fans?

As the debate between Doom (2016) and Doom Eternal continues, thereโ€™s a strong chance that ongoing player feedback will influence future updates or sequels. Developers may lean toward enhancing movement mechanics in potential new titles, especially as many gamers are vocal about their preferences. Experts estimate around a 60% likelihood that upcoming content will cater to the strong demand for faster gameplay and better controller support. This focus could also reshape game design in the first-person shooter genre, pushing developers to pay more attention to fluidity and accessibility in mechanics.

A Historical Lens on Evolution in Gaming

This situation draws a fascinating parallel to the evolution of the music industry in the early 2000s, when the rise of digital formats shifted how people experienced music. Just as artists adapted to new platforms like iTunes by focusing on singles rather than full albums, game developers might encourage refined mechanics that fit the fast-paced preferences of modern gamers. In both cases, the push for immediacy reshaped content delivery and player engagement, highlighting how user preferences can drive significant changes across industries.