Doubts About Double Exposure | Fans Slam Sequel as Unworthy

Fans of Life is Strange are voicing strong dissatisfaction with Double Exposure, which features Max as the protagonist. Released on April 17, 2025, opinions among players are sharply divided, leading many to deem the sequel a disappointing attempt at a follow-up.

Intensified Backlash from Players

Recent comments on forums reflect growing frustration, with players expressing:

"It’s absolute trash. It actively ruins everything we love about the original LiS game."

The critiques highlight several key issues:

Disrespect to Original Characters

Many fans argue that the sequel disregards pivotal storylines and character development from the original. A popular sentiment is:

• "If you picked the ‘Save Chloe’ ending, this game goes against it and devalues that choice."

• "Max's character feels poorly developed, potentially replaceable by anyone else."

Weak Story and Gameplay Mechanics

Critiques extend to gameplay as well, with comments revealing:

• "The story is a joke that rips off the first game and falls apart after the first two chapters."

• "This sequel lacks any real emotional engagement from players."

Frustration over Unresolved Plot Points

Players are also frustrated by the sequel's plot, which some claim leaves many questions unanswered, with additional costs for a potential follow-up to resolve them. One commenter noted:

• "You have to buy a potential sequel for that closure, which feels exploitative."

Community Sentiment

Negativity dominates the discussion, with many players advising others against purchasing the game. Several comments include recommendations for alternative titles like Lost & Records, which many feel maintain the spirit of the original.

Key Takeaways

• ✖️ Significant backlash on forums, marking Double Exposure as a contentious topic.

• 📉 Many fans feel it mistreats previous narratives and character arcs, deeming it a poor sequel.

• 🚫 "If you want a story that develops Max, it fails."

As critiques pour in, the fundamental question remains: Can sequels authentic to their predecessors ever truly succeed?