Edited By
Omar Ali

A growing debate among players rages over the viability of dual wielding great swords in the end game. Users on several forums express dissatisfaction with their experiences, pointing to struggles against high-speed enemies. The question remains: can this weapon combination stand strong in critical late-game encounters?
As players hit the upper-level cap, many are finding that combining the Dark Moon Greatsword with the Claymore creates challenges rather than advantages. One avid player states, "I keep struggling against the Draconic Tree Sentinel and fast enemies in Farum Azula." With both strength and intelligence stats maxed at 40 and vigor at 32, the performance of this combo is leaving some feeling frustrated.
Stat Distribution: Some players suggest altering stat setups for better results. A user notes, "Go full INT and use Magic Claymore instead." This strategy could offer enhanced synergy for those choosing to dual wield.
Weapon Effectiveness: The sentiment around the Dark Moon Greatsword is mixed. One player harshly states, "Itโs honestly not very good." Players are increasingly leaning towards one-handed tactics, advocating for the use of heavier options like pickaxes or great axes for a more effective play style.
Vigor Levels: Players emphasize the importance of vigor in maximizing survivability. One comment points out, "Get that to 40 ASAP." This reflects a key consensus that upgrading health can significantly impact gameplay late in the game.
Mixed sentiments dominate the forums. While some players find dual wielding to still be fun, the overall tone leans toward cautious criticism.
"Jump attack is a beast," notes one satisfied player, signaling that while the combination can be risky, there are still moments of success to be found.
๐ซ Not advisable to dual wield Dark Moon Greatsword; strategy deemed less effective.
โ๏ธ Consider switching to one-handed grip with stronger weapons for end game combats.
๐ Boosting vigor to 40 can enhance survivability by nearly 50%.
This ongoing debate continues to affect how players approach the game, sparking shifts in strategies and preferences. As more gamers share their experiences, itโs clear that adjustments to weapon choice and stat allocation will prove crucial for success in the end game.
As feedback continues to pour in, there's a strong chance that game developers will respond to community concerns about dual wielding strategies. Given the current heated discussions on forums, experts estimate around a 70% probability that developers will introduce balance patches. These patches could adjust weapon effectiveness and improve the synergy of dual-wielding setups. If changes roll out, expect to see many players shift back to this style, excited by newfound advantages, particularly as they face off against tougher end-game foes. Should these adjustments not happen, players may shift away from dual-wielding entirely, favoring one-handed weapons and tactical defense strategies, possibly creating a significant impact on the game's meta.
History echoes in the realm of gaming; consider the early days of competitive fighting games. In the late '90s, many players believed dual-character teams were the best strategy, only to find that single-character champions emerged as more consistent competitors. Just as fighters adapted to the meta, players today are learning the nuances of dual wielding, often switching tactics mid-game. The transition mirrors how strategies evolve in competitive realms outside gaming, showcasing the ever-changing nature of player optimization in pursuit of victory.