Edited By
Carlos Gomez
A coalition of investors, including Silver Lake, Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund, and Jared Kushner's Affinity Partners, is reportedly in advanced discussions to take EA private at an estimated valuation of $50 billion. Concerns arise as many people fear this could lead to radical changes that may hinder EA's creative output.
The potential deal could close as soon as next week, according to sources. But reactions from the gaming community are far from optimistic. People are voicing serious skepticism about the prospective management style with Jared Kushner involved.
One comment cautioned, "If this goes through, EA will literally die creatively." Thereโs a growing fear that the focus will shift to only profitable live service titles, wanting the elimination of beloved franchises and projects that don't guarantee quick returns.
Interestingly, discussions have highlighted three core themes:
Focus on Live Services: Many expect EA will cut down on non-service games and lay off staff to streamline operations around only lucrative franchises.
Impact on Development Studios: Concerns are rife about studios being dismantled or sold off if they donโt fit the new profitable model.
Future of Game Projects: Questions loom large over popular franchises like Mass Effect and EA Originals, suspected to be at risk of cancellation or overhaul.
"I expect this will be the beginning of the end of non-service games at EA," one commenter stated, capturing a prevalent sentiment.
๐ "Kushner's involvement raises red flags for many, fearing propaganda projects."
โ ๏ธ "EA may lose touch with its fanbase while trying to cut costs via AI innovations."
๐ฎ "Community-centric programs like EA Originals might face the axe."
As the deal progresses, questions about its long-term implications for EAโs franchises and the gaming industry at large linger. Will EAโs legacy survive this corporate shakeup? Only time will tell.
Thereโs a strong chance that if the takeover proceeds, EA will become increasingly focused on live service games, which are considered less risky financially. Experts estimate around a 70% likelihood of significant layoffs within development studios, as the new management might prioritize profit margins over creative diversity. This shift could lead to a streamlined portfolio favoring only high-revenue titles, resulting in beloved franchises getting sidelined, if not outright canceled. The gaming community is bracing for a new era where the very essence of creativity at EA may be stifled, leaving fans looking for their favorite games elsewhere.
A parallel can be drawn from the history of the board game Monopoly, where the methodical acquisition of properties often led to players staking their success on luck and strategy rather than innovation. Similarly, as EA risks losing its creative spark to corporate interests, the gaming landscape may shift towards a one-dimensional model focused solely on profitabilityโneglecting the unique narratives and experiences that once defined it. Just as Monopoly often results in a sterile competition lacking true engagement, EA could face a future that prioritizes financial outcomes over the community connection, threatening its foundational legacy in the gaming world.