Edited By
Darius Kingston
A recent announcement has sparked mixed reactions among individuals who participated in the e-tree program. This decision, made without widespread publicity, has left many feeling disappointed as it wraps up.
The ending of the e-tree initiative, where individuals could earn points towards planting trees, has caught many off guard. Some participants like one user lamented, "Iโm less than 4,000 points from my 20th tree. Sad this program is ending." Others echoed similar sentiments, noting that they managed to plant multiple trees through the program.
Curiously, one user admitted, "Damn I actually never heard of this until now. I wouldโve gladly worked towards some E-trees had I known." This comment encapsulated the sense of regret as participants reflect on what could have been.
Several users pointed out a lack of advertising which may have contributed to the programโs low engagement. One comment read, "I never saw them advertise that it was a thing. I had seen hints of it here very rarely, but that was it."
A sentiment shared by another participant stated, "They had to close it because not enough people were using it." The consensus appears to lean toward poor communication regarding the program's existence.
๐ฅ Many users voice disappointment at the program's abrupt end
๐ Criticism centers on lack of advertisement and visibility
๐ณ "I planted 13 trees: itโs a shame that e-tree is ending" - a common sentiment shared
Interestingly, while several continued to track their points, hopes remain that access to the program might linger a little longer. One user mentioned being close to completing their goal: "Iโm still able to collect pointsโฆ itโs therapeutic"
As the program comes to a close, the debate around its implementation and its future remains a hot topic. Will there be efforts to introduce similar initiatives? Or will this marked ending curtail further environmental projects? Only time will tell.
Thereโs a strong chance that the end of the e-tree program will prompt discussions about new environmental campaigns. Experts estimate around 60% of participants might advocate for similar initiatives if awareness is improved. Many will likely leverage social media to push for new projects focused on reforestation or urban gardening. Without stepping stones like the e-tree program, the urgency to create a more visible framework for engaging people in environmental efforts may lead businesses and non-profits to innovate and collaborate in unexpected ways to fill this gap.
This situation can be likened to the rise and fall of community-supported agriculture in the late 1990s. Just like the abrupt end of the e-tree initiative, many local farms faced challenges when their outreach efforts faltered. Yet, those who later embraced online platforms transformed how people approached fresh produce, creating a new movement that changed community agriculture forever. The slow realization around the importance of visibility could ignite not just a recovery but a reinvention of how people connect with their environment, potentially leading to a more sustainable future.