Edited By
Liam Chen
A wave of discontent among gamers is growing against the Epic Games Launcher, with many expressing strong opinions about its practices. Several commenters on forums are shedding light on this larger issue, mentioning the impact of exclusivity deals and the perceived inferiority of the platform overall.
The Epic Games Launcher has garnered significant backlash since its early days. Comments reveal a trend among gamers who feel the platform relies on exclusive titles rather than improving its user experience. One gamer lamented, "Not as shitty as it used to be, at least. Still better than EA or Ubisoft."
Epic's attempts to secure exclusive distribution rights for games like Borderlands 3 and Metro Exodus angered many. One user noted, "Epic made artificial scarcity at the expense of consumers." This sentiment underscores the frustration felt by those who miss the days of accessible gaming.
"All you have to do is Google it. They suck. tim sweeney sucks even more."
A combination of negative and neutral sentiments permeate the comments. While some gamers acknowledge improvements, many remain entrenched in their dislike. Key frustrations include:
Forced exclusivity deals limiting consumer choice.
Perception of the launcher as inferior compared to older platforms.
General discontent regarding the need for third-party sign-ins.
๐ Exclusivity deals are a major source of ire among gamers.
๐ "Make a better product? No. Provide more value? No." โ A common refrain.
๐ Sentiment analysis shows a leaning towards frustration with current offerings.
Gamers seem to have mixed feelings about the Epic Games Launcher. While some view it as an improvement, many still criticize its practices. The real question remains: will Epic address these concerns effectively?