Home
/
Gaming news
/
Game reviews
/

Why epic's sidekicks are the worst cosmetic choices ever

Controversy Brews Over Epic's Latest Sidekicks | Pay-to-Lose Claims Heat Up

By

Marcus Huang

Mar 20, 2026, 09:35 PM

Edited By

Dominic Crown

Snappy read

A display of Epic's Sidekicks cosmetics showing various characters that look unappealing and overpriced
popular

A surge of criticism is building against Epic's sidekicks, with users voicing strong opinions on their perceived drawbacks. Many argue these cosmetics distract players rather than enhance gameplay, leading to a heated debate on user boards.

Users Push Back

The introduction of sidekicks sparked mixed feelings among people in the gaming community. While some defend their inclusion, many argue they come with serious drawbacks.

Key Opinions

Three main themes have emerged from users:

  1. Distraction in Gameplay: Many believe sidekicks obstruct visibility, as noted by one user: "They literally run in your field of vision prompting you to think something is there."

  2. High Price Point: Several comments mention the cost of these cosmetics, with phrases like "grossly overpriced" commonly mentioned, raising questions about their value.

  3. Visual Appeal: There's a divided opinion on aesthetics; some find them

What Lies Ahead for Epic's Sidekicks?

As backlash grows, there's a strong chance that Epic will reconsider the sidekicks' design or pricing. With increasing frustration from players about their distraction in gameplay and perceived high costs, experts estimate around a 60% probability that we might see adjustments or a new system to replace them. Additionally, if complaints continue, Epic may implement a feedback-driven redesign, further solidifying their relationship with the community. As the conversation evolves on forums, anticipation builds about how Epic responds to user feedback, potentially shifting the gaming landscape moving forward.

Lessons from Digital Outrage in History

This situation echoes the responses seen during the 2018 launch of a certain online service that promised new features but only led to frustration. Just like Epic's predicament, early enthusiasm turned into public outcry as users felt deceived. In both cases, the core issue revolved around expectations versus reality, leading to significant changes in methodology and communication. As the community pushes for better experiences, we might witness Epic adopting a more transparent approach, just as that service eventually had to rebuild its trust with users.