Home
/
AAA games
/
AAA game reviews
/

Why first person gameplay outshines arc raiders

First-Person Gameplay Dominates Debate | Marathon vs. Arc Raiders

By

Aiden Patel

Apr 16, 2025, 11:04 AM

Edited By

Samir Patel

Updated

Apr 17, 2025, 03:14 AM

2 minutes of duration

Intense first-person gameplay action emphasizing stakes and strategy
popular

In the ongoing debate among gamers, opinions remain split over first-person versus third-person gameplay. Marathon is gaining prominence for its immersive first-person perspective, while Arc Raiders faces criticism for sticking to a third-person view, prompting discussions about the strategic depth and competitive edge of each approach.

Intensifying Arguments

Players consistently champion the first-person viewpoint, underscoring its role in enhancing tension. "A game about stakes and tension is always going to be better in first person," one gamer stated. Critics argue that third-person mechanics favor less competitive play, with one player noting, "The unrealistic peeking around corners just never has the same feel."

Feedback from the Community

Feedback on the gameplay mechanics includes diverse perspectives:

  • One gamer pointed out that gameplay like The Divisionโ€™s Dark Zone "isn't really competitive; it's a looter PvP game mixed with PvE."

  • A comment about Last of Us highlighted a nostalgic appreciation: "Man, that was a very fun time, and I didn't complain about the third-person at all."

Competition vs. Exploration

Many players voice skepticism towards third-person mechanics, indicating a belief that it dilutes true competition. The sentiment echoes throughout gaming forums, where a user states, "Third-person camera is inherently uncompetitive; it's why PUBG is now mostly played in first person." The ongoing discussion reflects an evolving community that desires a more strategic experience.

Nostalgia in Gameplay Experience

Supporters of third-person gameplay defend classic titles like SOCOM 2, maintaining that they can provide just as much engagement as first-person games: "Third Person > First Person but I grew up on Socom 2 so Iโ€™m biased." This mix of nostalgia and modern critiques continues to spark discussion.

Key Takeaways

  • โ–ณ Many players argue first-person shooters create a more engaging experience.

  • โ–ฝ Gamers are divided, with skepticism toward third-person games remaining strong.

  • โ€ป "Is there truly competition in a genre where you sometimes don't fire a shot?" - Noted sentiment in forums.

As the debate heats up, players are questioning traditional preferences and whether newcomers can shift the balance in the ongoing tug-of-war between first-person and third-person gameplay styles.