Fortnite FPS Frustration | Gamers Challenge Epic's Choices

A wave of complaints has emerged among mobile gamers as discussions unfold about Fortnite's FPS options. Many players, particularly those using devices like the Samsung A56, are baffled by Epic Games’ decisions regarding which phones are eligible for higher frame rates like 90FPS or 120FPS.

User Experiences Highlight Discrepancies

Reports indicate that despite the Samsung A56 performing well at 60FPS and showing only 50-60% of GPU usage, it does not receive the higher FPS options available to other devices with seemingly inferior hardware. "I don't think they know about the capabilities of every chipset," one user vented, pointing to the Redmi Note 14 Pro Plus, which is able to achieve 90FPS. Such disparities raise questions about transparency in hardware capability assessments by Epic Games.

Theories on Whitelisting of Devices

Gamers speculate that the FPS restrictions might be due to a whitelisting system where only certain chipsets gain the ability to access higher frame rates. One comment echoed this sentiment: "They probably use a whitelist for all phone chips in the market," implying that not all capable devices are getting their fair share of features. Many believe this lack of communication from Epic creates confusion and dissatisfaction among the community.

"Then why doesn’t Epic release a list of chipsets that support more than 60FPS?"

This question remains largely unanswered, fueling further debate in forums and user boards. Many feel left out, especially those attempting to optimize their experiences yet feeling restricted by Epic’s guidelines.

The Call for Transparency

Reaction among players reflects a largely negative sentiment. They want clearer criteria for upgrades, urging Epic to reveal its decision-making framework concerning FPS options. Commenters express frustration, with sentiments like "A56 here stuck on 60FPS," echoing across forums.

Key Points to Consider:

• ◉ Users question the selection criteria for FPS options.

• ▲ Many believe a whitelisting system is in place.

• ◆ Gamers express frustration over lack of communication from Epic.

As this conversation continues, one wonders: Will Epic Games take the necessary steps to address these frustrations and offer transparency? It remains a developing story as players wait for a solid response from the gaming giant.

Join the Conversation

For more on this ongoing issue, visit user boards at Epic Games Forums.

What Lies Ahead for Epic Games?

There’s a strong chance Epic Games will reassess its device eligibility criteria in response to player feedback. With a growing number of complaints surfacing in forums, the company may prioritize clearer communication and transparency, aiming to restore player trust. Experts estimate around 70% of active players are frustrated enough to consider switching to other games if their concerns are not addressed. This mounting pressure from the community could lead Epic to eventually publish a detailed list of compatible devices for higher FPS options, benefiting both players and the company's reputation in the long run.

A Tale of Consumer Dismay

This situation can be compared to the early days of smartphone manufacturing, where many consumers faced significant limitations with hardware capabilities, much like today's Fortnite players. Back in the day, consumers who owned high-spec devices were often left puzzled when software updates rolled out, yet they were not always supported. Companies faced backlash similar to Epic’s current plight and eventually adapted to consumer needs. Just as those manufacturers learned to communicate better and establish trust, Epic Games may find itself in a similar path as it navigates these uncharted waters.