Components Guide | Prioritizing Your Build for Survival

A growing dialogue in gaming forums highlights the challenges players face when prioritizing components in their builds. With a plethora of options emerging, gamers are grappling with the need to optimize their inventory while ensuring survivability in combat.

Recent discussions point out that many builds today operate with only one HP module, making it crucial to strategically choose component combinations. Some players warn about the risk of becoming too squishy with lesser combinations. A notable player mentioned, "Squishy is bad. HP is king; DEF is worthless past 5K."

Key Insights on Component Combinations

Players suggest several 2/2 set combos that promise a balance between skill and survivability:

• 2x Asc Armory/Hunter: Prioritizes cooldown and cost savings.

• 2x Mage/Firebrand: Enhances skill power, range, and duration.

• 2x Mage/Plague: Focuses on skill power while offering tech benefits.

• 2x Mage/Polar: Offers increased skill and chill power.

It's clear that not all combinations are favorable, particularly those marked in red. One seasoned gamer advised, "You can deprioritize all the sets that are red-colored, except for Enlightened Mage and Hunter."

Common Themes Emerging From Discussions

1. Cooldown Importance: Users are placing a higher premium on cooldown rates, claiming, "Cooldown is nearly universally useful and high-priority."

2. HP Module Necessity: Many emphasize that not having a single HP module leaves players vulnerable. "You’re using Asc Armory for the 2x HP main stats; not for the Cost buff."

3. Adaptability of Current Sets: Players advocate for more flexibility in stats within component sets. One user commented, "A good route would be to switch/implant stats in the sets."

Voices from the Community

"Thanks, that is handy. The Slayer should be mentioned as an exception too."

"2x Volcanic + 2x Fire Brand can get you 4x HP main stats."

Analyzing Trends in Gameplay

Forum discussions reflect a mixed sentiment about component effectiveness, but it's largely constructive. Players are actively seeking to optimize their performance. They are willing to test and iterate on various combinations, focusing on what works best for their characters. Does the current system offer enough flexibility for gamers to truly shine?

Key Takeaways

• 🔺 Survivability vs. Damage: Prioritize HP modules to avoid squishiness.

• 🔄 Flexibility: Community calls for adaptability in component stats.

• 💬 Design Flaws: Some see conventional sets as outdated, needing rework for better balance.