Do Game Journalists Play What They Review? | Debates Arise Over Game Reviews and Completion Rates
Edited By
Omar Ali
A recent discussion ignited by comparisons to the Oscars raises eyebrows over game journalists’ review practices. Are journalists truly completing the games they critique, or are they rushing through the content? This conversation suggests potential inconsistencies in gaming reviews.
Context of the Debate
Gamers are questioning whether game reviewers engage with the titles thoroughly before forming opinions. Unlike movies, which can be passively watched, games demand significant time investment. The crux of the issue lies in whether reviewers play all the nominated games or just a select few uniquely fitting their preferences.
Main Themes from The Discussion
Reviewer Engagement
Many participants affirm that professional journalists typically engage deeply with the games they review. "Yes, we play the games we review. We tend to like games," stated one reviewer, adding that enjoyment fuels the commitment to finish them.
Completion Challenges
The long hours needed for some games — especially larger titles — mean that not all reviewers finish their games completely. One noted the reality of saying, "If the game is boring me out of my mind and I’ve completed more than 50% I can just drop it."
Transparency in Critique
Reviewers often disclose their progress and opinions, sharing that not all games are suited for a full completion. Reflecting on their own experiences, another commenter claimed: "A good reviewer should be open to changing their mind"
"You can't steal someone else's review. They can't write unless they play!" - One commenter highlights the necessity of engagement to write meaningful critiques.
Sentiment Patterns
The conversation appears mixed, with both affirmations of professional integrity and frustrations over quality. While many reviewers assert they play their games, some commenters suggest there’s a lack of thoroughness in the industry.
Key Takeaways
⚡ Many gaming journalists do play the games they review, focusing on engagement and enjoyment.
🔄 However, game completion isn’t always possible or practical, leading to varied reviewer experiences.
📣 Transparency in sharing reviews helps manage player expectations, emphasizing subjective preferences.
As the conversation evolves, it raises a critical question: How much should completion influence a review’s credibility? The debate is bound to continue as gamers seek authenticity in the criticisms they trust.