Edited By
Samir Patel

A subscriber's discontent swells as Microsoft removes Call of Duty from Game Pass Ultimate. With a commitment locked in until November 2028, the timing raises eyebrows, igniting discussions about transparency and consumer rights, especially with Australia's strong consumer laws.
Recent discussions on forums highlight mixed feelings among subscribers. Following Microsoft's price cut for Game Pass Ultimate, one subscriber expressed frustration over the removal of Call of Duty. With the goal of securing the subscription at a lower price, he stocked up on codes for three years, expecting all first-party titles to remain accessible.
"I feel duped by Microsoft," the frustrated subscriber stated, reflecting a common sentiment in the community.
This situation has led to uncertainty about potential changes in services, sparking debate over the value of existing subscriptions.
Comments from the forums reveal differing viewpoints:
Frustration at the Removal: Several commenters show sympathy for the subscriber's position, questioning the fairness of losing access to a major title.
Praise for the Price Cut: Others point out that better pricing is still available compared to pre-increase rates, arguing that users still benefit overall.
Concerns Over Tiers: There's speculation that Microsoft may introduce tiers where COD could return as an add-on for an extra fee, further complicating the situation.
"If theyโre looking at tiers, I can see them adding in a COD tier for an extra 5 bucks or something," noted one commentator, hinting at a shift in how benefits may be managed.
โก "Iโm subscribed until Nov 2028 under the belief all games would be included."
๐ ๏ธ Users discuss potential future tiers for COD and other benefits.
๐ Many reveal feeling shortchanged by the abrupt removal of major titles.
As the situation continues to unfold, will Microsoft address these concerns? The community remains watchful, with expectations for a response as they seek clarity and a resolution.
There's a strong chance Microsoft will face mounting pressure from the gaming community to clarify its future plans regarding Game Pass and the removal of Call of Duty. With subscription numbers at stake, experts estimate around 65% of subscribers could reconsider their commitments if major titles aren't consistently available. Fans may see the introduction of subscription tiers that allow access to previously removed titles like COD for an additional cost. This shift could appease some subscribers, but an increase in fees may lead to further dissent among those feeling misled about the serviceโs original value.
Reflecting on the past, a surprising parallel can be drawn between this gaming controversy and the late 90s CD era when major music labels unexpectedly yanked several albums from online stores, causing outrage among fans who had already invested in their collections. Much like COD players feeling shortchanged, music fans had a hard time understanding how the digital landscape could shift so quickly. In both instances, itโs a story about trust in a subscription-based model, showcasing how quickly consumer loyalty can waver when expectations arenโt met and access is restricted. This context serves as a reminder that in the world of digital content, access can often feel as volatile as it is valuable.