New Game Review | Players Say It Beats Origin but Drags On
Edited By
Julia Forester
A growing number of players argue that the latest installment in the series surpasses its predecessor, Origin, though many feel it suffers from excessive length. As discussions swell in user boards and forums, opinions on gameplay and story pacing emerge.
Length and Repetition Fuel Discontent
Commenters have voiced mixed feelings on the game's expansive journey. Limiting the focus to core elements, gamers note that the game's notable length is paired with repetitiveness. One user remarked, "Length isn’t inherently bad, but Valhalla feels bloated with side content integrated into a linear story."
Many players expressed frustration with the time commitment. One stated, "I quit Valhalla 150 hours in, which is less than I spent on Odyssey." This sentiment highlights a significant concern among players regarding the overall enjoyment versus grind.
Comparisons with Odyssey
Comparisons to Odyssey are frequent. Players emphasize that while Odyssey had its share of lengthy gameplay, it offered a diverse range of activities. As one dedicated forum member put it, "Odyssey’s gameplay loop was more addictive, and I never felt fatigue like I do in Valhalla."
Those who embrace Valhalla noted the game's intricate world design and depth. Returning players mentioned, "Currently, I’m in my second playthrough I want to 100% the game, but it feels like a marathon."
Key Insights
💡 Players indicate that despite its impressive world design, the game’s length may be counterproductive.
⏳ A notable number of players quit due to repetitive tasks.
🎮 Comparisons to Odyssey highlight a balance issue between content volume and player engagement.
With its evolving narrative, Valhalla has clearly sparked conversation within the community. While many embrace the expansive content, the question remains: does length truly enhance the gaming experience?