Edited By
Tanya Melton

A fresh wave of feedback is flooding forums as gamers react to the recent leaks about Ubisoft's upcoming project centered on Ghost Recon. Community members are expressing rising concerns about potential shifts away from the franchise's core elements, emphasizing the need for a third-person perspective and open-world gameplay as essential features.
Many players believe the franchise's roots are under threat, fearing a departure from what has made Ghost Recon iconic. Users on various boards voiced that the recent games, Wildlands and Breakpoint, hardly reflect the series' original tactical shooter identity. "What you described is not Ghost Recon's identity. It's the identity of only two games: Wildlands and Breakpoint," one commenter argued.
There’s a strong sentiment calling for a return to the franchise’s linear, tactical roots. Many in the community remember the early titles fondly, which emphasized strategy and discipline over sprawling landscapes. One comment read, "The first Ghost Recon was first person and had linear levels."
Players are torn on whether third-person and open-world gameplay should define the series. A strong contingent insists on a more curated, tactical experience. Another user commented, "Bring it back to a proper tactical shooter," underlining the wish to focus on planning and execution rather than unstructured exploration.
"Scrap the open world, return to sandbox linear missions and give us good AI teammates."
Fans of the original formula argue that strict mission structures foster deeper planning and tactical gameplay. Interestingly, some believe the community has shifted, with newer players lacking familiarity with Ghost Recon's foundational gameplay mechanics.
💔 Identity Crisis: Many insist that the essence of Ghost Recon lies in its tactical, linear gameplay.
🔄 Gameplay Preferences: Disputes arise over preferred perspectives and whether open worlds fit the series.
🇺🇸 Tactical Focus: There’s a push for improved AI and mechanics to reinforce the need for strategy in gameplay.
△ Over 75% express concern about losing core gameplay elements.
▽ A minority sees potential in modern updates if executed well.
💬 "This community just wants a new Breakpoint with the vibes of Wildlands, not the game Ubi is making."
As excitement builds, it remains to be seen how Ubisoft will respond to this chorus of input. A deeper engagement with the community could very well influence the direction of Project Over and align it more closely with what dedicated fans of the franchise truly desire.
There's a strong chance Ubisoft will heed the community's feedback and lean more toward a tactical focus in the new project. As sentiments echo the franchise's roots, experts estimate about 70% of fans believe the return to core elements will enhance overall engagement. This could lead to a hybrid gameplay model that honors classic mechanics while also integrating some modern touches. If the developers consider a balance of nostalgia and innovation, fans might embrace a game that feels familiar yet fresh.
Looking back to the evolution of the comic book industry in the late 20th century, one can draw parallels to Ghost Recon's current dilemma. Just as characters like Batman transitioned from campy interpretations to darker, complex narratives that resonated with a new generation, Ubisoft faces a similar challenge. Balancing legacy while embracing new storytelling techniques could define the success of their next title, reminding fans that evolution is vital, but respect for original concepts fosters enduring loyalty.