Edited By
Dominic Crown

A recent discussion among gamers has ignited a heated debate about the most fragile Warframes in the game. As players share their insights, it appears Banshee and Loki are among the most commonly mentioned when it comes to lacking survivability. With comments revealing their low health and armor, players are weighing in on the implications for gameplay.
The topic revolves around identifying which characters possess little to no defense mechanisms. Comments reveal that some characters, like Gara and Gyre, are often deemed not viable for tough battles due to their lack of protective abilities.
Banshee's Vulnerability
Players widely agree that Banshee is a frontrunner as one of the least survivable options. "No I-frames, no big HP or shield pools," cited one player, highlighting her extreme fragility in battles.
Loki's Low Stats
With only 280 base health, Loki's effective health is notably low, making him an easy target. A player remarked, "The squishiest Warframe is Loki," showing a consensus on his lack of durability.
Debate on Effectiveness of Other Frames
Gyre and Nidus also faced scrutiny. Some players argue Gyre lacks survivability in her base kit, saying, "She has 0 survivability" without specific builds. Meanwhile, Nidus struggles due to outdated gameplay mechanics, leaving many players vulnerable in high-stakes situations.
"If youโre not careful, you WILL die," one user noted about Nidus's difficulty in tougher games.
Overall sentiments reflect frustration and concern regarding the balance of strength among different Warframes. Many feel that adjustments are needed, particularly for those characterized as glass frames.
Banshee and Loki consistently identified as the most fragile characters.
Concerns about gameplay balance are echoed strongly by community members.
Suggestions for potential buffs could lead to greater viability for players using these frames.
"Banshee is a frontrunner. Loki and cyte 09 are incredibly brittle"
"Gyre has 0 survivability in her base kit."
"Players need to be mindful; poor choices lead to death!"
โฝ Banshee, Loki, and Gyre top the list for weakest frames.
โณ Community voices push for balance changes to enhance durability.
โฆ "The weakest link can spiral down entire teams," warns a player.
As the discussion develops, it seems many players are championing for a change to ensure a more balanced gameplay experience, potentially reshaping the game's dynamics in future updates.
As the conversation surrounding Banshee, Loki, and their fragile status continues, there's a strong chance that the game's developers will respond with adjustments aimed at enhancing these Warframes' durability. Community feedback and player frustrations often catalyze shifts in game balance, and experts estimate around a 70% likelihood of buffs or revisions in upcoming patches. These changes could not only empower players using traditionally weaker characters but also transform the overall gameplay experience by promoting a more strategic combat approach and reducing frustration in high-stakes situations.
This scenario parallels the early days of competitive basketball, where teams often relied heavily on a few star players, neglecting balance across the roster. Just as adjustments were crucial then for achieving victory through teamwork, the current Warframe debate highlights a similar need for balance in character abilities. The game's progression requires characters to work together harmoniously, much like a well-rounded basketball team finds success by opting for plays that utilize every player to maximize their strengths. As the community pushes for change, history shows that adapting to enhance collective strength often leads to greater victories.