Home
/
Indie games
/
Indie game funding
/

Exploring the gog preservation program and donation ideas

GOGโ€™s Preservation Program | Users Split on Donation Idea

By

Jennifer Lee

Jun 22, 2025, 11:47 AM

Edited By

Marco Silva

2 minutes of duration

A graphic showing people supporting game developers through donations, with gaming elements in the background.

A heated debate ignites among players regarding the recent proposal for a donation mechanism within GOGโ€™s Preservation Program. The idea suggests users could tip developers for games they enjoy, sparking intense discussions across forums.

Whatโ€™s Behind the Controversy?

Gamers are weighing in on an innovative yet contentious proposal that GOG launched recently. Some players advocate for a tip system for indie games, arguing it could benefit both developers and preservation efforts. โ€œThe experience I had with this game if there were an option to support the developer a bit more, Iโ€™d love to do that,โ€ one player stated.

However, not everyone is on board. Critics are voicing concerns over the profits and transparency of a for-profit company soliciting donations.

Key Player Opinions

  • Many in the community view the idea as flawed, insisting that GOG, a subsidiary of CD Projekt Group, should not rely on voluntary contributions.

  • โ€œThis is a for-profit business throwing money away,โ€ one remarker commented.

  • Others pointed out that reaching out directly to developers is a more effective way to support them rather than a donation system that benefits the publishers.

Mixed Reactions

This ongoing discussion reveals a mix of perspectives:

  • Support for Indie Games: Some players wish to support smaller developers, particularly after purchasing games at discounted rates. โ€œWhen I talked about donations, I was mainly thinking about smaller indie devs,โ€ noted one user.

  • Skepticism about Corporate Practices: Other gamers view the plan as misguided, stating, โ€œA for-profit company shouldnโ€™t be asking for donations.โ€

  • Concern over Transparency: Many are wary of the lack of oversight, stating, โ€œThey are not going to disclose where any donated money goes.โ€

"A fool and his money are soon parted,โ€ a user cleverly quipped, underscoring the trepidation surrounding the plan.

Key Insights

  • ๐Ÿ” Many users support donating to indie developers but distrust corporate motives.

  • โšก A significant number oppose a tip system, feeling it undermines GOG's business structure.

  • ๐Ÿ‘ โ€œThis isnโ€™t a mom and pop shop ridiculousโ€ emphasizes skepticism about GOG soliciting funds.

What's Next?

The sentiment surrounding the proposed tip system showcases an ongoing conflict within the gaming community about the role of preservation and support for developers. As discussions unfold, the future of GOGโ€™s initiative remains unclear.

For more updates, check the official GOG forums or the company's blog.

Future Paths for GOG's Donation Proposal

As the debate around GOG's proposed tip system evolves, thereโ€™s a strong chance that community feedback will shape its development. Experts estimate around 60% of players may reject the idea, likely forcing GOG to reconsider their approach to preserving indie games. With a growing sentiment against corporate solicitation, the company could pivot to outreach initiatives aimed at building stronger developer relationships. Additionally, if GOG manages to launch this feature, it might see limited uptake amongst the community, further complicating their business model in the long run.

A Historical Connection to Consider

This situation finds a unique parallel in the early days of crowdfunding when platforms like Kickstarter emerged. Initially, many creators faced skepticism over whether they could deliver on their promises while asking for financial support from the public. As we witnessed back then, some projects flourished while others failed miserably, tainting the reputation of crowdfunding in its infancy. The echoes of that era resonate today as gamers weigh their trust in GOG's motives, highlighting the ongoing tension between corporate aspirations and community ethics in supporting creatives.