Edited By
James Lee

A growing discussion among players is raising eyebrows over how some folks are acquiring fully upgraded gold weapons at the start of games. With a mix of frustration and humor, users are debating whether this strategy actually benefits their gameplay.
The phenomenon comes as players express their disbelief and confusion in various online forums. Many are bewildered by the concept, questioning the effectiveness of such upgrades so early. A post stating the bafflement sparked laughter and discussions around gameplay strategies and economic decisions in the game.
Upgrading Early is Risky: Many players suggest that upgrading weapons right away can be a waste. "Usually the worst players upgrade guns right away," one player observed, indicating that rushing upgrades is not a smart move.
Perks vs. Weapons: There's a prevailing thought that prioritizing perks over weapon upgrades might be better. "A good Kestrel (or linked Dahlia) certainly can get one quick," a user commented, implying that player skill matters more.
Differences in Weapon Tiers: Users are mixed on whether upgrades yield significant benefits. "He is just gaslighting," retorted one player, referencing another's claim that no difference exists between weapon tiers.
"Not exactly groundbreaking, but the edge from upgrades seems slight."
โ๏ธ Players argue about logic behind early weapon upgrades: Many believe it's a hasty choice.
๐ฐ $15k wasted? Critics laugh at those who spend heavily on early upgrades.
๐ค Perks vs. weapons? Test your strategy: Each player's approach reveals their understanding of the game mechanics.
Interestingly, the discussion continues, as players weigh the pros and cons of their choices in this free-to-play environment. As the community grapples with this and other strategic decisions, will attitudes toward gold weapon upgrades shift? Stay tuned as this story develops.