
A heated debate among fans has reignited over which group faced the worst fallout between Seasons 1 and 2. Discussions are growing intense across various forums, with many asserting that Season 2's conflicts surpass those of its predecessor.
While some fans argue that Season 1 featured tense moments without betrayal, Season 2 erupted into chaos.
"As tense as the S1 group dynamics were, they could at least stay united when motivated enough," remarked one fan, illustrating the stark contrast with Season 2's divisiveness.
Violence and Betrayal: Season 2 escalated with multiple incidents of characters turning on one another. A user emphasized, "We got an obviously unwell Kenny brutalizing Arvo every chance he gets, Mike and Bonnie getting scared of him enough to steal everything and run."
Deteriorating Leadership: The internal structure began to crumble right from Season 2's opening, indicating that factional conflicts impeded the group. One comment pointed out, "This group dynamic was scuffed as hell."
Loyalty Issues: Notably, Janeโs loyalty was called into question, with fans stating that she showed little connection to anyone outside of Luke and Clem.
Sentiments among fans trend negative toward Season 2's character dynamics. Many found the ongoing infighting frustrating, echoing feelings of disappointment.
Questions about character fates continue to arise. One fan blamed Luke's death on reckless decisions, remarking, "How did Luke get himself killed? That was Bonnieโs fault."
๐ฅ The consensus is clear: Season 2 had a worse fallout than Season 1.
๐ Discord-driven narratives seem to overshadow the teamwork from Season 1.
๐ โThis group dynamic was scuffed as hell,โ reflects a widespread frustration among fans.
As discussions persist, fans wonder: Can future seasons rekindle the strong ties that initially endeared them? Only time will tell.