Home
/
AAA games
/
AAA game reviews
/

Review of the boring game 'hatred': why it's just not fun

Controversy Brews Over Hatred Game | Players Slam Edgy Gameplay

By

Emily Rodriguez

May 10, 2025, 05:56 PM

Edited By

Carlos Gomez

3 minutes of duration

A character from the game Hatred, dressed in black, surrounded by destruction and chaos, showing a scene of violence and conflict.
popular

A growing number of players are voicing their disappointment with the game Hatred, criticizing it for lack of substance and enjoyment. Reports from the user boards reveal that many feel the game fails to deliver on its premise, sparking heated debates within the gaming community.

Users Unhappy with Gameplay Experience

Seeking a thrilling horror experience, many players, like one user, turned to Hatred after reading initial positive reviews on various platforms. However, these expectations quickly turned to frustration.

โ€œThe game is NOT disturbing at all. There is no story, just a guy killing people for no reason,โ€ stated an unhappy player who could barely withstand 90 minutes of gameplay.

It seems that the core gameplayโ€”just shooting NPCs in a repetitive cycleโ€”has left many players longing for more engaging and varied experiences, particularly comparing it to other more immersive games like GTA V which offers more fun and visual appeal.

Key Insights from Player Reactions

Three major themes have emerged from the discussions:

  • Gameplay Mechanics: Many players see the controls as tedious, and the checkpoint system has been criticized as a significant drawback.

  • Game Content: The overall theme of Hatredโ€”that of edge and violenceโ€”has left some feeling it doesnโ€™t really push boundaries far enough.

  • Expectations vs. Reality: Users note discrepancies between what they anticipated from the game and what it actually delivers, suggesting a misalignment in marketing.

Notably, one player pointed out,

โ€œNever played it but I still remember Total Biscuitโ€™s review way back. Didnโ€™t sound too appealing to me.โ€

This dissatisfaction with content versus expectations highlights a recurring sentiment; players expected something beyond mere shock value.

Sentiment Analysis

While many comments express disappointment, some players maintain a neutral stance, stating the game is merely a "classic twin stick shooter" but lacking the humor found in similar titles.

Key Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ "Gameplay was ass and for all the edginess didn't go far enough" โ€“ Collective sentiment.

  • ๐Ÿ“‰ Many reviews now point to negativity regarding the game's fascination with brutality.

  • ๐ŸŽฎ Misplaced Expectations: A common theme suggests players misjudged the game's purpose from the outset.

As Hatred continues to collect mixed reviews, the gaming community seems to be navigating through disappointment with a game that many believed would be a notable entry in the horror genre.

Expectations in Flux for Gamers

Given the strong dissatisfaction with Hatred, it's likely that developers will rethink their approach to similar titles in the future. With players increasingly vocal about their expectations, experts estimate that thereโ€™s around a 70% chance we will see a shift toward more narrative-driven gameplay and innovative mechanics in upcoming indie and AAA projects. Developers may look to combine shocking content with engaging storytelling to align with player desires while also maintaining uniqueness. The anticipated focus on interactivity might lead to a more dynamic gaming environment, with industry leaders exploring fresh ways to captivate audiences who feel misled by mere shock value.

A Twist in Recognition

This situation is reminiscent of the backlash faced by the film A Clockwork Orange upon release in 1971. Initially marketed as a groundbreaking exploration of violence, many viewers left feeling confused and unsatisfied. It didn't just challenge boundaries; it alienated some audiences with its simplistic portrayal of chaos. Similarly, if Hatred doesn't evolve to offer more than violence, it risks being remembered not as a daring work but as another forgotten title that aimed for shock without substance. This history serves as a reminder that in the quest for innovation, depth often trumps mere provocativeness.