Edited By
Isabella Martinez

A wave of commentary has emerged regarding Hazardโs surprisingly low pick rate in recent gameplay. Despite a questionable win rate, players are questioning the hero's viability amid significant nerfs and a perceived lack of exciting gameplay mechanics.
Multiple players have pointed out that Hazard has become less effective following a series of updates. "Heโs gotten significant nerfs and had already been difficult to play well," one player noted. While his win rate hovers around the non-threatening range, many find him less appealing.
Comments reveal dissatisfaction with multiple aspects of Hazard's design and performance:
Skill Ceiling: Users argue that Hazard requires high map knowledge and game sense.
Design Flaws: Many think his character design isn't engaging. "People just don't want to pick him because he looks so weird!" one player commented.
Comparison to Other Tanks: Players frequently compare him to better options like Doomfist or Reinhardt, stating that they offer more reliability and damage output. "Why play him when Doom is just better and more reliable?" said one frustrated player.
The community's responses paint a mixed picture:
"He felt like a worse version of every other tank."
Players are clearly torn, expressing nostalgia for Hazard while also acknowledging his struggles. A frequent player lamented, "Barely played him at all since patch since it feels so terrible."
โ๏ธ Players deem Hazard as situationally weak; many prefer stronger tanks.
๐ฎ Overall sentiment skewed negative, with design and mechanics under scrutiny.
๐ Several players noted a steep learning curve deters new users from trying him.
As players continue to explore the tank meta in the current game, Hazardโs fate hangs in the balance, sparking debate over balance changes and design philosophy within the community. Could a redesign be on the horizon for this once-prominent hero, or will he remain a forgotten choice?
Stay tuned for updates as more players share their experiences and insights as the game's landscape evolves.
There's a strong chance that the developers will take note of Hazard's current standing and respond with adjustments in the coming updates. Given the community feedback, around 70% of players are likely to advocate for balance changes, especially if he remains a low-pick choice. Additionally, thereโs potential for a redesign to make him more engaging and viable, especially if player sentiment continues to escalate. However, if the issues persist, he might remain an underwhelming option, skewing the gameplay towards the more favored tanks like Doomfist or Reinhardt.
This echoes the fate of certain classic video game characters faced with the same challenges, like the infamous character from an older fighting franchise who was deemed too complicated for casual players. Despite his unique abilities, the community gravitated towards simpler, more straightforward options. As time unfolded, the developers recognized this trend and revamped him, allowing him to reclaim his place in the spotlight. Much like Hazard's struggle today, it shows how crucial community feedback is in shaping character viability and overall game dynamics while keeping the excitement alive.