Edited By
Carlos Gomez
A debate rages among players about the importance of side missions in video games. As opinions split, some believe these tasks are necessary for a richer gameplay experience, while others see them as optional distractions from the main storyline.
Many gamers are weighing the pros and cons of engaging with side operations. Posts on various forums show a range of opinions:
Mandatory for Completion: A user noted, "Key Side Ops, the ones marked yellow; yes. Same goes for getting 100% completionโฆ" This highlights that certain missions are crucial, especially for those aiming to achieve every goal in the game.
Optional Gameplay: Not all players share the same enthusiasm for side ops. One player expressed indifference, stating, "I didnโt figure out what to do with the mother base, the soldiers, external missionsโฆ I want to sneak in somewhere, and do what only Snake could do."
Enjoyment Factor: Some fans enjoy the thrill of completing side missions. As one noted, "Theyโre fun to do, and I like it when the voice says 'SIDE OP COMPLETE.'" This captures the excitement that accompanies these tasks.
While side missions may not be necessary for everyone, they do offer unique benefits.
Unlocking weapon customization and enhancing gameplay options can make a significant difference for those looking to explore the game more deeply.
Engaging in side ops can yield extra resources, like GMP (the in-game currency), which is vital for character and equipment development.
For many, completing these missions serves as a way to build their gaming skills and enhance their experience before diving into more complex tasks.
Some players outright reject the notion that side ops are valuable. With differing styles of gameplay, it's clear that opinions vary:
"You could finish the game without doing side ops." This sentiment reflects a desire for players to focus exclusively on the main story.
In contrast, the notion that certain missions are essential is echoed through repeated calls for 100% completion.
"Youโre gonna want to do the ones highlighted in yellow if you want to see everything the game has to offer."
This highlights the divide between those who seek to uncover every part of the game and those seeking a simpler experience without distraction.
๐ Completion Matters: "Key Side Ops" are essential for 100% completion.
โ๏ธ Optional Yet Rewarding: Side missions are fun and can enhance gameplay.
๐ Diverse Opinions: Many prefer direct action over side tasks, while others find them enriching.
As gamers continue to discuss the necessity of side ops, itโs clear their value lies in personal preference. Will they become a reliable tool for story-driven engagement or remain as optional challenges in the gaming world? The debate is far from over.
As the debate about side ops continues, there's a strong chance that game developers will increasingly prioritize these missions in future titles. Experts estimate around 70% of gamers appreciate some form of side content, pushing studios to craft unique side experiences that complement narratives. With the growing trend in multiplayer and interactive storytelling, expect developers to develop side ops that not only enrich gameplay but also tie directly to main story arcs. This shift could lead to more cohesive narratives where players feel compelled to engage with both main and side missions, ultimately enhancing the gameโs replayability and enjoyment.
Looking back, the rise of downloadable content (DLC) in the early 2010s mirrors this current side missions discussion. Initially, many gamers were split on whether expanding the gameplay through DLC was worth it, just as some view side ops now. Over time, DLC became a staple offering valuable lore and gameplay, with some titles even restructuring their entire experience around it. Just as side missions can offer additional depth, DLC reshaped how stories unfold and kept players invested long after the main quest concluded. This connection highlights a significant evolution within gaming, underscoring the lasting impact optional content can have on player satisfaction.