Home
/
AAA games
/
Franchise updates
/

Infamous second son missing from ps plus catalog raises eyebrows

Second Son Excluded from PS Plus | A Marketplace Conundrum

By

Raj Patel

Aug 16, 2025, 04:38 AM

3 minutes of duration

Cover art of Infamous Second Son featuring the main character standing confidently with neon powers in a vibrant city background
popular

A notable twist in the gaming community has surfaced as Infamous: Second Son remains the only title in the series absent from the PS Plus catalog. Users express bewilderment over the decision to offer earlier installments while the widely popular third game is locked behind a paywall.

What's the Buzz?

The discussions heating up on forums reveal mixed sentiments about Sonyโ€™s choice. Most players feel itโ€™s odd to access the first two games, including the DLC for the second, while the installment that brought the franchise into the PS4 era is missing. "What do you mean we own this franchise?" one commenter scoffed, echoing a common frustration.

A Cult Classic in the Making

Second Son, released in 2014, has gained significant traction as a cult classic. It sold remarkably well at launch and continues to generate interest. โ€œIt was a landmark title of the last generation,โ€ a user noted, indicating how its status has evolved over the years. Many players are coming back to it for the first time, sparking conversations about nostalgia and access.

The Game's Current State

While users celebrate the visual feats of Second Son, the experience of accessing the earlier games through PS Now has been criticized for poor performance. โ€œI swear I was getting 10-15fps on average,โ€ lamented one player who recently platinumed the first title. This has raised questions about the viability of streaming services for older titles and their impact on the gaming experience.

Users' Concerns and Observations

The situation has drawn attention to several themes:

  • Access Frustration: Players want the ability to play all installments without additional costs. "I donโ€™t know why they donโ€™t let everyone have that ability," lamented a commentator.

  • Performance Issues: Many reported subpar performance on PS Now, indicating a broader service concern, especially for streaming older titles.

  • Demand for Ownership: Community members voiced a desire to own classics like Second Son, highlighting the need for better access across platforms.

โ€œSucks they do this man, I want to own them again.โ€ - Anonymous

Key Insights

  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ Second Son remains absent from PS Plus, causing user frustration.

  • ๐Ÿ’” Streaming issues on PS Now lead to discontent among players.

  • ๐Ÿ’ฐ The gameโ€™s growing cult status marks it as a key part of gaming history.

As conversations continue to simmer, one has to wonderโ€”what does this mean for the future of classic game access and ownership in the gaming landscape?

What Lies Ahead for Second Son?

Thereโ€™s a strong chance that Sony will reevaluate its decision on Infamous: Second Son and consider adding it to the PS Plus lineup by the end of 2025. With increasing user frustration and calls for better access, the company may respond to community pressure to avoid losing player loyalty. Experts estimate around 60% likelihood that an announcement will come within the next six months as Sony looks to enhance its service offerings amid heightened competition in the gaming subscription market. Additionally, if performance issues on PS Now persist, it might push Sony to rethink streamability and possibly introduce a more robust infrastructure for handling classic titles.

A Game of Monopoly and Blockbusters

Reflecting on the past, this situation mirrors 1990s board game monopolies, where a popular game like Monopoly kept older versions discreetly away from public sight, only providing access to select editions. Just as players demanded the complete experience, only to be met with a limited selection, gamers today find themselves in a similar bind with access to Second Son. Both touch on an issue of availability versus ownership, questioning how much control companies hold over what consumers can access โ€” a notion likely to resonate with many who have felt the sting of exclusion.