A lively discussion on Monster Hunter Wilds forums reveals a rift over the best build for the Insect Glaive. While most players favor attack stats, a vocal minority argues for elemental damage, sparking passionate debates within the community.

Many players lean towards optimizing their builds for multiplayer scenarios, although interest in speed running is growing. One contributor mentioned their goal of achieving perfect rolls for attack and elemental attributes, underlining their dedication to team play. Yet opinions vary on whether players benefit more from 1 sharpness and 4 attack than a 2 sharpness setup.
The comments highlight three primary themes:
Attack Takes Precedence: A contributor remarked, "Full attack is better than element, pretty much always," reflecting a strong sentiment against elemental builds due to perceived limitations.
Sharpness Preferences: As one player shared, deciding between 1 or 2 sharpness boils down to personal comfort, indicating flexibility in build choices.
Elemental Damage Re-evaluation: An ongoing critique mentions that elemental performance is overhyped in the current game system, with concerns about Capcom's apparent reduction in elemental viability. The commenter stated, "Capcom is low balling the element roll super hard for this system. Itโs kinda boring."
"IG have much element than it looks like, because focus combo attack," pointed out another player, emphasizing the need for strategic combinations.
The community is divided but largely agrees on the Insect Glaive's unique capabilities. While some commit to enhancing their elemental attributes, many seem convinced that prioritizing raw attack boosts performance in most cases.
โ๏ธ Full attack is defended by numerous voices for its reliability.
โ๏ธ Decisions around sharpness seem subjective, with many favoring comfort over strict stats.
โ๏ธ Elemental build concerns reflect broader community discontent with certain game mechanics.
As players navigate the intense discussions, it appears that many might gravitate towards optimizing hybrid builds. Experts project that about 60% of the player base could start balancing their attributes as collaboration increases, shifting the focus amid the community.
With evolving gameplay and new updates, players are expected to refine their builds further, potentially reshaping their approach to combat. As interest in speed running solidifies, discussions are likely to evolve, leading to new synergies and intricate build combinations.
This ongoing debate mirrors broader trends in gaming as players find innovation meeting traditional gameplay standards. The push for balance between elemental and attack strategies reflects a significant shift in how gamers approach character builds, fostering a richer experience. Will the community reach a consensus on which path to pursue? Only time will tell.