Edited By
Nicolas Dubois

A growing chorus of gamers is voicing frustration over significant changes to Ivaraโs Concentrated Arrow ability, overshadowed by attention on Valkyr adjustments. Many players feel the new updates compromise core functionality, causing alarms among the loyal fanbase.
Recent adjustments aim to make Concentrated Arrow "better" as a single-target damage dealer, but feedback has been mixed.
Critical Chance Boosts: The shot now deals a 50% Critical Chance on fully charged shots. Users welcome this changeโ"itโs a good change as long as it affects the explosion," one player noted.
Weak Point Issues: Another change grants an additional 50% Critical Chance on weak points, but players argue that the explosions donโt benefit from this bonus, limiting effectiveness.
Status Effects and AOE: The AOE explosion now applies Status Effects with a 20% base chance. Some acknowledge potential for new builds, but doubts remain about its overall utility.
Line of Sight Check: This alteration has sparked significant backlash. The explosion now checks for line of sight within just 5 metersโmany see this as a crippling nerf. One user succinctly commented, "Line of sight bad right?"
The community response reflects a mix of hope and skepticism. Players appreciate some buffs but remain concerned about the ability's overall viability in diverse combat scenarios.
"Why would I use this when other options are more effective?" another user questioned.
๐ Many Ivara players feel the buffs don't offset the nerfs, especially the line of sight change.
๐ต A strong desire exists for developers to revisit line of sight mechanics to enhance gameplay.
โณ๏ธ "Now you can pound on the boss or elite mob harder," one comment suggested, highlighting the focus on elite combat.
As developers continue to refine the game, many hope for a reversal on the controversial line of sight modification to restore the thrill of using Concentrated Arrow.
With ongoing adjustments and community feedback, it will be interesting to see how these changes affect gameplay and player satisfaction. The debate between buffs and nerfs is a topic that keeps the dialogue lively and engaging among fans.
Just like the previous updates for other shooters that faced backlash, such as the Destiny franchise during its weapon tuning, where developers had to revert or adjust changes, this scenario mirrors the ongoing struggle between player desires and developer intentions. In both cases, when a beloved feature is altered and leads to community frustration, the urge to amend such changes often becomes undeniable. This parallel provides insight into the tension between keeping game balance and satisfying the community's passion, reminding us how the delicate balance can tip quickly in the world of gaming.