A wave of discussion surrounds Lords of the Fallen following its 2.0 update and price drop to around $20. While some players show interest, many criticize the co-op experience, raising questions about its value, especially for newcomers to Souls-like games.
Reactions on forums highlight new concerns:
Co-op Critiques Intensify
Players are highlighting serious issues with co-op gameplay, with one forum user stating, "a lot of people are overhyping the update. Co-op isnโt working properly, with many synchronization and hit registration issues, along with teleporting enemies and glitchy umbral elements." This feedback has some players reconsidering their interest.
Value of the Update
Despite the criticisms, a few players remain optimistic, citing the reduced price as justification to give it a try. One commented, "I wonโt even be mad if I donโt like the game," reiterating the lowering price point as a risk mitigator. However, others remain skeptical, suggesting alternatives such as AI Limit or Khazan.
Comparison to Other Games
While some players assert Lords of the Fallen is closest to emulating the feel of Dark Souls, others believe it pales compared to other titles like Lies of P and Nioh, prompting a mixed sentiment around its position within the genre. One dissenter called it "the worst among Souls-like games."
"Lords of the fallen is pog," stated an enthusiastic player, hinting at the ongoing divide in community attitudes.
โ ๏ธ Criticism of co-op system highlights synchronization and glitch issues.
๐ฒ New $20 price tag attracts mixed feelings from players hesitant about gameplay depth.
๐ Some players recommend alternatives, claiming this game is a poor representative of the genre.
As gamers continue to express their opinions, itโs clear that while some see potential in the recent changes, a significant portion remains doubtful, setting the stage for ongoing discussion.