Edited By
Omar Ali
A dispute is brewing among players after several report losing in-game currency without refunds for already owned items. The issue has raised eyebrows in the community, especially following recent draws that left many frustrated.
Backlash intensified over the weekend as users vented their frustrations online. Reports indicate that at least 240 CP was lost in two separate draws, leaving players questioning the refund policy. Many are pointing fingers at a lack of clarity regarding what constitutes an โownedโ item.
Refund Confusion: Many are uncertain about the game's refund mechanics, stating instances of not receiving refunds for items they already possess.
Community Frustration: Comments reveal a rising tide of anger towards the developers, especially from those feeling misled by descriptions.
Support Skepticism: Players express doubt that support will resolve their issues effectively, with past experiences coloring their perceptions.
"Yeah, this time it happened to me for the 2nd time. Idk what does this even mean when on the description it clearly says that it gets refunded."
The reactions on forums are mixed, with many taking to user boards to voice their complaints. One player remarked, "Man, as a Type 19 main, I could have gotten the Celestial Ink for free."
Another shared a similar sentiment: "Was it from the pick a card draw? Because I didnโt receive refunds for items I already had either. This is the first time that this has ever happened."
A general sentiment of disappointment prevails within the community. The majority of comments exhibit frustration, with several players expressing disbelief over the lack of a proper refund system.
โฝ 240 CP lost by some players due to refund glitches.
โ ๏ธ Confusion remains over refunds for owned items amongst community members.
๐ Previous experiences lead players to doubt support effectiveness.
Curiously, players are left wondering how such a simple mechanic can turn into a significant issue. With ongoing discussions flowing through forums, will developers respond to address these discrepancies before further dissatisfaction arises?