Home
/
AAA games
/
AAA game reviews
/

Marathon falls short as extraction shooter revival

Marathon: Bare Minimum for Extraction Shooters | A Disappointment for Fans

By

Liam O'Connor

Mar 1, 2026, 05:49 AM

Edited By

Tanya Melton

2 minutes of duration

A scene showing characters in a detailed environment of the game Marathon, featuring action and exploration elements.
popular

A wave of fan disappointment is rising around Marathon, Bungie's latest foray into extraction shooters. Gamers expected a dynamic experience akin to Hunt: Showdown, but many are finding a standard formula that fails to innovate.

High Hopes, Low Returns

Fans of extraction shooters had their expectations set high with Marathon. With impressive art design and a star-studded voice cast, early previews hinted at something special. However, the consensus after gameplay is discouraging.

"Marathon is the 2007 Honda Civic of extraction shooters," one player lamented. The game offers basic mechanics: enter with gear, battle enemies, and extract if possible. But there's little beyond the unique art style.

Key Issues Highlighted by Players

The gaming community is vocal about three main frustrations:

  • UI and Navigation: Many players agree that the user interface is poorly designed, calling it the "worst UI design I've seen in a video game." One gamer remarked, "The menus are a maze."

  • Looting Confusion: Confusion abounds over what is interactable versus lootable. A user summed it up well: *"It's so true what can be looted is often unclear."

  • Lack of Core Features: Without crafting or base building, the basic gameplay can feel stale. One user even mentioned, "Iโ€™m kinda glad thereโ€™s no crafting; I hate that."

Mixed Sentiments from the Community

While some players appreciate certain aspects, overall sentiment appears negative. "Shooting is fun, but itโ€™s a complete mess while looting," another said. Players are frustrated by the expectation of depth, which doesn't seem to be delivered.

"Bungie's focus on this feels misplaced, especially when many are eager for Destiny 3."

As players continue to compare Marathon to other extraction shooters like Arc Raiders, the verdict is clear: this title might not stack up to expectations.

Key Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿšซ Many players find basic gameplay repetitive and unremarkable.

  • ๐Ÿ“‰ The UI has been widely criticized for user-friendliness.

  • ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ The absence of essential features like crafting leaves players wanting more.

With Bungie facing a mix of optimism and frustration, only time will tell if updates can salvage Marathon from mediocrity.

What Lies Ahead for Marathon and Bungie

Experts estimate that Bungie will need to act swiftly to address player feedback on Marathon. Thereโ€™s a strong chance the team will roll out updates focused on UI improvements and introduce more core features within the next few monthsโ€”perhaps even by mid-2026. As dissatisfaction grows, a 60% likelihood exists that these changes could reignite interest and attract back some players. If not, Marathon risks fading into the background, much like other games that failed to innovate after their initial hype faded.

Echoes from the Past: Can Marathon Find Its Footing?

In the early 2000s, the release of the Anthem game brought similar responses from fans. Initially hyped for its stunning graphics and promise, it ultimately fell short due to lack of depth and innovation, drawing comparisons to Marathon's current predicament. Just as Anthem struggled with replay value and player engagement, Marathon faces the task of redefining its experience. If Bungie approaches its current challenges with creativity and focus, thereโ€™s a possibility of revival, illustrating that sometimes, a fresh perspective can turn disappointment into success.